The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Prediction: Bengals beat Jets, Steelers | Chick Ludwig At Large
 

Home > Blogs > Chick Ludwig At Large > Archives > 2008 > October > 10 > Entry

Prediction: Bengals beat Jets, Steelers

I see something in Marvin Lewis’ eyes.

I hear something in Marvin Lewis’ voice.

Intensity … and … resolve.

I believe Sunday, Oct. 12, is the day the Cincinnati Bengals scratch out their first victory of 2008.

Brett Favre is a lean, mean INTERCEPTION throwin’ machine.

The final: Bengals 24, Jets 20.

And while I’m at it, I’ll just go ahead and say once the Bengals get this win, another will follow — quickly.

What's your Bengals-Jets prediction for Sunday, Oct. 12?
  Bengals win by TD or less
  Jets win by TD or less
  Bengals win in a blowout
  Jets win in a blowout


Voter Limit: Once per Hour
View Poll Results

On Sunday, Oct. 19 at Paul Brown Stadium, the Bengals will defeat the Pittsburgh Steelers.

I know what loyal LUDWIG AT LARGE readers are thinking and saying:

“Chick, what R you smokin’?”

That’s fine. Go ahead & rip me if the Bengals lose to the Jets.

But feel free to praise me if the Bengals win.

And if the Bengals lose, I can only imagine what PBS will look like a week from Sunday.

Lots of black & gold.

INITIAL REACTION

From Keith in Cincinnati: “Chick, is it free liquor day at the paper? Back-to-back wins for the Bengals against teams each coming off the bye? I say Jets win 30-20 with Favre throwing 3 TD passes. If the Bengals are 0-6, PBS will look like Heinz Field next week, Steelers win going away.”

Permalink | Comments (16) | Post your comment | Categories: Bengals

Comments

By Danny Farmer

October 10, 2008 11:34 AM | Link to this

I love the optimism! That’s hard to come by in Bengalville nowadays. The offense has just been so terrible with the two and a half year absence of a running game that I don’t see it happening. Plus, many fans might say the defense is improved, but they haven’t been tested. Let’s see what happens when they have to hold a lead (maybe I should have written “if” they ever have a lead to hold)

By Danny Farmer

October 10, 2008 11:35 AM | Link to this

I love the optimism! That’s hard to come by in Bengalville nowadays. The offense has just been so terrible with the two and a half year absence of a running game that I don’t see it happening. Plus, many fans might say the defense is improved, but they haven’t been tested. Let’s see what happens when they have to hold a lead (maybe I should have written “if” they ever have a lead to hold)

By Brian

October 10, 2008 12:35 PM | Link to this

Is the drunk fan available to run onto the field and snatch the ball away from Favre again? I figure the Bengals will somehow end up with 4-5 wins; just enough to make sure they draft one pick after the one player who could help them most has been taken. They might fluke out one of those wins against the Jets, but the Steelers will beat them senseless.

By Jim

October 10, 2008 12:44 PM | Link to this

Hey Chicken! Only a brain dead liberal (sorry, that’s redundant) would pick the bungles over the J-E-T-S and Steelers. Talk about losing any remaining credibility, you’re even lower than stock price of NYTimes…and that’s been falling like a lead baloon for years.

By Robert Young

October 10, 2008 1:13 PM | Link to this

Ah Chick next Sunday PBS is going to look like Heinz Field West no matter what happens this week. Now that we know it’s Fitz still feel confident?

By Scott Mitchell

October 10, 2008 1:16 PM | Link to this

Carson is out for the Jets game. Still feel confident the Bengals will be 2-5?

By Chick Ludwig

October 10, 2008 1:27 PM | Link to this

Ahhh … Yes, I do. And thank you for asking. Best, Chick

By Brian

October 10, 2008 1:36 PM | Link to this

If they have time to adjust the game plan to suit Fitzpatrick’s strengths maybe he will unleash a flury of rainbow bombs to Carl Pickens, igniting flames of hope in the city… Oh wait, wrong decade of losing.

By scott

October 10, 2008 2:18 PM | Link to this

Carson Palmer is not starting vs. the Jets this weekend. will they still win chick

By got milk

October 10, 2008 3:04 PM | Link to this

no way - the drive to perfection (0-16) continues.

By Bold and ridiculous

October 10, 2008 3:48 PM | Link to this

Fitzpatrick throws3 TD’s, and rushes for 68 yards and another TD. Chris Perry fumbles twice but neither are lost. Cedric Benson rushes 12 times for 79 yards and a TD. Ocho Cinco has his first 100-yard game. Leon Hall pick-six. Pat Sims plays and gets his first NFL sack. Bengals win a wild one 44-38. Thank you for reading this ridiculousness. (BTW, i think we can pretty much bank on the next home game looking like Heinz field, the Jets game has no bearing on that)

By Darrell Terrell

October 10, 2008 4:30 PM | Link to this

hey Jim——what is a baloon? and, what are you partaking of?

By na baby na

October 10, 2008 4:45 PM | Link to this

Chickster, this time that limb you crawled out on won’t even support a kitten…0-7, for sure for Bengals.

By Chris

October 10, 2008 8:11 PM | Link to this

Lets see well Palmer not starting and obviously this team relies on one person, and watching his back up against Cleveland makes me extremely nervous and I wish i could say we’ll win comfortably but I cant so we’ll have to wait and see. WHO DEY I HOPE GO BENGALS

By psychostats

October 10, 2008 11:03 PM | Link to this

I’m with Keith. You know, there used to be rumors that Jackie Gleason wasn’t really drinking coffee at the end of his TV shows. “How sweet it is!” … At this point, wouldn’t it be better if the Bengals finished 0-16? A full-scale fan revolt might not accomplish much, but it sure would be fun to watch. Maybe that is the new optimism.

By We STINK

October 10, 2008 11:39 PM | Link to this

Chick, Chick, Chick. I have to say I’m a little shocked at your sudden optimism. What in the WORLD makes you think we’ll beat the Jets and the Steelers? That’s just crazy talk. It was neither intensity nor resolve in Lewis’ eyes. He was just intently thinking of more cliches to unpack while discussing our losing performance at the postgame conference. Or perhaps he was just hungry.
Post a comment



Remember me?




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Reds insider news by e-mail

Our Reds Connection e-mail newsletter contains exclusive insider news on the Reds that you can't get elsewhere — not even on our web site.

See Sample | Privacy Policy

Most popular in Sports


Copyright © Sat Jul 04 23:30:53 EDT 2009 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.