DaytonDailyNews.com

By ëàìèíàò

August 13, 2008 12:12 PM | Link to this

rbq Een plaatje zegt alles, toch ? efs Het volledige rapport is hier te vinden. Lees natuurlijk g de blogposting. f c Thanks for interesting post! okl ëàìèíàò êóïèòü 5t

By Ron

August 4, 2008 2:51 PM | Link to this

I agree a rookie cap is needed, the salaries are out of control and teams with high draft picks don’t really get better because they spend so much on unproven players. The players union may agree to it if it means more money for veterans. Agents are the ones that would be most against it, and I don’t think they get to vote.

I don’t really blame the Bengals on this hold out, 8th and 9th spot were bad spots to pick and there’s rift in talent and salary.

By Larry

August 4, 2008 12:54 PM | Link to this

NFL adopted a policy for the minimum amount cap, it was affectionately known as the Cincinnati Bengals, AKA, Mike Brown rule. Mike would attempt to sign the top free agents & they wanted no part of Mike Brown family that runs the team. He wouldn’t sign anyone and pocket the money. Hamilton Co. Commissioners were going to sue Mike Brown for breach of contract for not fielding a completive team. NFL legal counsel advised Mike that there was no way he would win the suit, we got Marvin Lewis.

By donny

August 4, 2008 11:57 AM | Link to this

I agree with Mark No Cap Means Cincy might get 2 at most 3 wins per year. They have proven that they will not spend the money

By Steven Ross

August 4, 2008 10:51 AM | Link to this

Groundhog Day all over again. Nothing should surprise anyone. Simply consider the source of our ineptitude for 17 long years.

By dsto

August 4, 2008 10:42 AM | Link to this

Wanted: The Bengals have been pressured for years and years to change the way they do things up and down the line. They have not had success in any area of football and the fans and the media alike have called for heads to roll, have begged for the ownership to hire quality people, have screamed for a compettive team to no avail. I like my home team Bengals, but I will never expect anything but mediocity at best from them until they start acting like a profesional football team.

By Wanted: dead or alive - Bengals GM

August 4, 2008 10:25 AM | Link to this

Why hasn’t there been media pressure for the Bengals to hire a “real” GM. Lughead makes it seem that it’s the agents and players fault that players can’t get to camp with a contract. One winning season in 17 years. Two 1st-rd draft pick signed before camp in 17 years. Come on Lughead, it’s not rocket science. Write (and continue to write) about the Bungles getting a GM, please!

By charles

August 4, 2008 10:21 AM | Link to this

what is next ? pay perview super bowl or no tv games that are free or $200 tickets to pay for the players salary no other profession pay any where near that so lets say the get 50 million make the pay a doc 10 million for doctor visits i agree that it do take a toll but lets keep it fair a cap does that to a extent

By Mark

August 4, 2008 9:42 AM | Link to this

It is apparent that the agents are holding their players out because of lenght of contracts. If the league goes to no salary cap, then the league is over to a degree for smaller market teams such as the Bengals. It will look just like baseball, on the large markets in the playoffs. We’ll get to see the Boston, NY, Dallas, and maybe ?? whoever else will buy every player they can get scenario. I’ll quit watching, that’s 4 sure !