By Bill

April 28, 2009 5:27 PM | Link to this

I hope Plummer thinks about this proposed law more thoroughly. Is this law going to hamstring us in law enforcement in that the address of the owner of the vehicle is not going to be available through LEADS? How are police officers going to know if a vehicle belongs in the area? Passage of this law will make it unnecessary to provide a copy of a registration to a police officer when stopped for a traffic violation.

By wasteoftime

April 28, 2009 5:39 PM | Link to this

Plummer should worry about fixing the 911 Center, and not testifying to enact “knee-jerk” legislation.

By jimmie

April 28, 2009 5:44 PM | Link to this

Why does one even need to have the registration in the car? Police can easily look it up from the plate. If it is a bogus plate, then the lookup will not match.

By Freedomlover

April 28, 2009 6:23 PM | Link to this

The real issue at hand are the perverts like Meyers who are habitual criminals, get a slap on the hand, then released back into society.

By FU LE

April 28, 2009 7:48 PM | Link to this

Bill, how would you know if a vehicle “BELONGS” in an area to begin with? A car comes back with a West Dayton address but you stopped them in West Carollton. So they don’t belong there? I guess this is how pigs get revenue though.

By Bill from Brookville

April 28, 2009 8:57 PM | Link to this

I haven’t carried a registration since the ‘60’s and no Officer has made an issue of it

By Bill

April 28, 2009 9:09 PM | Link to this

FU LE, maybe you don’t care who is cruising your area at three in the morning but law abiding citizens do. I’ve stopped cars registered to owners from the east side in west Dayton many of nights. Guess what, they had either just connected for some narcotics or were looking for some. Get over your assumptions, we are out there doing a job the GOOD CITIZENS EXPECT.

By Debra

April 28, 2009 9:12 PM | Link to this

Sheriff Plummer - charging $100 a year to decades old homeless sex-offenders living under bridges. Allowing 911 calls go unanswered. Letting “grandma” bake in a raging fire. Now again, trying to deflect attention while shining the light on the Nelson family. Phil Plummer: One mistake, after another, after another, after another, after another. Montgomery County can’t allow Phil another term. The county’s citizens can’t afford any more of Phil’s mistakes.

By Debra

April 28, 2009 9:13 PM | Link to this

Sheriff Plummer - charging $100 a year to decades old homeless sex-offenders living under bridges. Allowing 911 calls go unanswered. Letting “grandma” bake in a raging fire. Now again, trying to deflect attention while shining the light on the Nelson family. Phil Plummer: One mistake, after another, after another, after another, after another. Montgomery County can’t allow Phil another term. The county’s citizens can’t afford any more of Phil’s mistakes.

By Gary

April 28, 2009 11:23 PM | Link to this

Hey Bill, if you are in law enforcement and use your work address as we are allowed to do, then you should know that LEADS shows your real address and not your work address. This bill is to just remove the address from the paper registration and not from the system. It will have no effect on law enforcement and besides that, I couldn’t tell you the last time I asked for a registration on a traffic stop. I get that info from LEADS.

By Jbuck

April 29, 2009 4:51 AM | Link to this

I was going to say, can’t it still be in the system and not on the registration. (ie. ss number)

By joe

April 29, 2009 9:30 AM | Link to this

Bill, I share your concern, however not having the address on the registration will not affect the database.

By get a clue

April 29, 2009 10:27 AM | Link to this

Try reading the bill dummies. This will only remove the address from the paperwork. Not LEADS! An officer will have all the information he needs.

By Fred

May 1, 2009 9:05 PM | Link to this

I think Plummer should get on tv and talk about it before he testifies again.

By 94stroker

May 5, 2009 9:12 AM | Link to this

Durring a crime, display a gun… Mandatory 10 years, Shoot that Gun 25 Years, Kill someone life no parole. Problems will get better then!

By Frank

May 5, 2009 9:31 AM | Link to this

I understand it is safer to look like you are fighting crime by pulling over the drug buyers cruising the streets but the real problem requires a little more courage. GO bust the drug dealers and stop profiling the citizens of your community. One drug dealer supplies how many junkies? Obviously you have a good idea where these drug dealers are so if that is the case there is no excuse not to take them out other than a lack of courage or a payoff.

By Frank

May 5, 2009 9:40 AM | Link to this

Furthermore I do not fear your kids who come to the west side looking to score dope in my neigborhood. My fear is that yet another of our children will become a victim to these drug dealers we have not taken off the streets. I, as a citizen expect drug dealers to be your target and when you do see a deal go down take out both the dealer and the buyers. Street level crime is the result of not doing the job you are paid to do and that is take out the big boys! No leader no organization. Dayton is probably like the US governement though and the drugs are financing something the politicians support like a new pool or a house outside the city!

By Frank

May 5, 2009 9:41 AM | Link to this

Furthermore I do not fear your kids who come to the west side looking to score dope in my neigborhood. My fear is that yet another of our children will become a victim to these drug dealers we have not taken off the streets. I, as a citizen expect drug dealers to be your target and when you do see a deal go down take out both the dealer and the buyers. Street level crime is the result of not doing the job you are paid to do and that is take out the big boys! No leader no organization. Dayton is probably like the US governement though and the drugs are financing something the politicians support like a new pool or a house outside the city!