Home > Blogs > Get on the Bus > Archives > 2006 > May > 19 > Entry
Charters not following the law?
A coalition of charter school critics, led by the Ohio Federation of Teachers, has released a new study of Ohio charter schools and how they comply with state laws. Here’s their summary. Let me know what you think::
Although charter schools are defined by Ohio law as public schools, those operated by educational management companies claim their teachers are not public employees. Charter schools are required to have independent, non-profit boards, yet boards assembled by management companies exercise little independent oversight.
A new study of the four largest charter school chains provides new evidence that many Ohio charter schools do not operate as public schools, contrary to state law. The research, conducted by the Braddock Organization, reveals that charter schools are tightly controlled by their management companies, which prefer secrecy over public accountability.
The research refutes assertions by a charter school attorney in oral arguments before the Ohio Supreme Court. On Nov. 29, 2005, Chad Readler of the Jones, Day law firm, told the Court that charter schools “…carry every indicia of a public entity.� (*Transcript of Nov. 29, 2005, Ohio Supreme Court hearing on Case 2004-1688, Ohio Congress of Parents and Teachers v. State of Ohio Board of Education et al.)
But, charter schools operated by National Heritage Academies, the Leona Group, Summit Academy Management and White Hat Management (the largest operators of charter schools in Ohio) refused to provide public information when requested by Braddock. All but 2 responses to 71 public information requests came from management company officials or attorneys, not the charter schools themselves. All consistently declined to provide contracts of teachers employed at the schools. Each said the teachers are employees of the private management company and not public employees of the schools themselves. Therefore, they responded, information about the teachers’ contracts is private.
One board member also noted in his response that contracts of teachers employed at the school are unavailable even to its board members.
Yet, the schools make contributions to the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS), a pension fund for public school teachers, in apparent contradiction to these claims.
The Ohio Supreme Court recently ruled on a similar public records issue. On April 6, the Court ruled that the records of private or nonprofit entities are public when the services they provide are the traditional province of government and financed with public money. The ruling was made in a case that dealt with the public records of Oriana House, which operates private corrections facilities funded by public tax dollars.
Private management companies will receive a majority of the nearly half billion tax dollars the state pays to charter schools this year.
In an effort to determine whether charter school boards exercise meaningful oversight of the schools, Braddock researchers requested minutes for charter school board meetings held in 2005. The documents provided reveal a pattern of boards assembled and controlled by management companies rather than by independent boards.
The Leona Group
The Leona Group’s chain of charter schools includes 6 in Ohio that enroll 1,027 students. Contrary to the requirement that each charter school be run independently, one superboard controls operations for all of Leona’s charter schools in Ohio. This superboard conducted business jointly for all of Leona’s charters in one session, including the 6 currently open for business and 3 more that are in the planning stages.
Summit Academy Management
Summit Academy Management’s chain of charter schools includes 19 in Ohio that enroll 2,250 students. Contrary to the requirement that each charter school be run independently, one superboard also controlled operations for all Ohio charters run by Summit Academy Management. Unlike Leona’s joint session for all charters, Summit’s superboard appears to have convened and adjourned each charter’s business, holding several meetings in succession on the same day.
National Heritage Academies
National Heritage Academies’ chain of charter schools includes 9 in Ohio that enroll 3,510 students. Contrary to the requirement that each charter school be run independently, National Heritage charter board members overlap, with the same group of people conducting business for multiple National Heritage charter schools. Several board members appear to be interchangeable, serving on multiple boards for short stints throughout the year.
White Hat Management
White Hat Management’s chain of charter schools includes 34 in Ohio that enroll 16,000 students. White Hat runs one superboard and several smaller groups of people who serve on the boards of multiple White Hat charter schools. More than half of White Hat’s charter school board members serve on the boards of multiple schools. Three members serve on 18 different White Hat charter school boards, one member serves on 17 different White Hat charter school boards, one serves on 10 different boards, and three serve on 9 different White Hat charter school boards. Eighteen members serve on 2, 3 or 4 different White Hat charter school boards.
“It’s clear the public has no voice in these schools,� said Tom Mooney, chairman of the coalition, commenting on Braddock’s findings. “No one but the company CEO has any say.�
PTA Executive Director Barbara Sprague said, “Charter schools were called community schools in Ohio to signify that they would establish closer ties to the parents and community. They were to be less bureaucratic and more autonomous than traditional public schools. But these schools are just the opposite. Board members represent the management companies, not the community or parents.�
“The central concern of the League of Women Voters of Ohio about community schools continues to be accountability to the tax-paying public,” said Carol Gibson, co-president of the League of Women Voters of Ohio.
Permalink | Comments (5) | Categories: Charter Schools and School Choice

Dayton Daily News education reporter Scott Elliott writes about schools, kids, teaching and learning.
Comments
By chartteach
May 31, 2006 7:56 PM | Link to this
Unfortunately, most charter schools teachers don’t have a contract. We wish we could have a union as well. Most charter school board members are there for the resume building. They are not involved, nor do they seem to care about the school they are working with.By Rick
May 21, 2006 7:16 AM | Link to this
Scott, that article was pretty pathetic. It starts out by complaining charter schools are not as forthcoming as public schools. Apparently the law does not require them to do so. The complaint about the Boards might have some validity. This article is merely the screed of the old leftist coalitionsists, teachers unions, Colleges of Education, and, of course, the League of Women Voters (which should be renamed the Soviet of Socialist Women).By Mary
May 20, 2006 2:00 PM | Link to this
Providing “for the common defense” has a constitutional basis in the federal government. I suppose it could be contracted out, although it seems there might also be some words in the Constitution about raising a militia or having a standing militia. Actually, some people associated with the military would say the Army, Navy, and Air Force are sometimes competing fiefdoms and sometimes have competing fiefdoms within each branch. They all also make use of a lot of contractors. I do not think of the military as having a single organized branch or philosophy for education and training even though they have or used to have training commands focussed on some of the training. In World War II, apparently many women were used to train men to fly. Supposedly, the Naval Academy uses a lot of civilians to train and teach cadets while the Air Force Academy relies heavily on military trainers/professors. A lot of contractors and government civilian are used to train military personnel, depending on what the training is. What is your point?By Oldprof
May 19, 2006 9:53 PM | Link to this
It boils down to enforcement. We don’t have enough cops at any level of education; accrediting agencies don’t put schools on probation unless they’re egregiously wrong, Ohio’s universities have no controlling agency, public schools thrive or go sour in a luck-of-the-draw school board election. The next question is; how will we better impose military discipline in our school administration? Shall we have a single organized system to provide each needed level of education (as we do in the US military or in public safety), or shall we have dozens of little competing fiefdoms that become impossible for enforcement officials to track? What say you Mary, would our military be better if we each could choose a public “charter” Army/Navy/Air Force/Marines/Coast Guard?By Mary
May 19, 2006 3:39 PM | Link to this
Funny, I have had the same complaints about public schools that the public school union is having about charter schools. Public schools are notoriously reluctant to give out information, even some information they are legally required to provide to the public. Some of many examples - schools mislead or try to downplay options students and parents have such as the post secondary enrollment option. Teacher contracts are also difficult to find out about. It is obvious public schools do not want the public to know a lot of details. It might shoot holes in their propaganda about teacher pay and benefits, and interfer with school levy spin and marketing.