Home > Blogs > Get on the Bus > Archives > 2008 > September > 11 > Entry
Chicago’s influence on Obama’s education thinking

(Obama speaks at Stebbins High School Tuesday.)
Both the Eduwonk blog and The New York Times are writing about the ways Chicago’s school reform over the last decade or so has influence Obama, who was involved in community work and a member of the state legislature during much of that time.
If you want a fuller idea of where Obama is coming from on education, both are worth checking out. Personally, I’d like to see a story somewhere the describes how John McCain’s personal philosophy about education was shaped. McCain’s critics say this is not a topic he has much interest in and therefore there’s not much to learn about how his views were formed. Can the Times or another news organization dig into the truth or fiction of that assertion?
Update: Here’s an Associated Press story that compares and contrasts Obama and McCain on education that I found through Education Writers Association’s Education Election blog.
(Image credit: Teesha McClam, DDN)
Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment | Categories: Tracking Barack Obama

E-mail
E-mail
E-mail
Comments
By School Supporter
September 19, 2008 9:28 PM | Link to this
Those articles were nothing but damage control for the Obama campaign, along the lines of “Sure, unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers squandered millions of dollars from the Annenberg Foundation under the supervision of Senator Obama, but lots of other people were conned too!” Obama’s ed advisors seem determined to repeat the greatest ed policy failures from the nation’s past. In contrast, Bill Clinton got it right 20 years ago: “The Common Agenda: Liberating Undreamed-Of Talent,” Bill Clinton, Governor of Arkansas & Chairman, Education Commission of the United States: “State agency and local administrative control is deeply entrenched and there is great, often justified, fear that too much deregulation could lead to falling minimums rather than rising maximums. The system of selecting, training, evaluating and rewarding school leaders seldom encourages both competition and innovation. Entrenched bureaucracies—from teacher colleges to administrator groups to teacher unions—often fight harder for their turf and their retirement benefits than for more flexible, open and efficient ways of educating children. A powerful inertia grips the system. Many within it have tired of state mandates piled on the already considerable burden of their jobs and have decided to “wait this one out,” as they have waited out reforms in the past. You can try to change a complex system like this through outside pressure and influence, but without the support of people inside the system not much will happen. On the other hand, people inside the system will never change it radically without the help of policymakers, community leaders, business leaders, and others outside the system. The key to success in the next stage of reform is to get people inside and outside the system to work in tandem.”