Latest featured videos from DaytonDailyNews.com

Blogs

Blogs

  • :
    A crime novel set in Dayton...
    May. 26
  • :
    Rockies continue to dominate the Reds
    May. 25
  • :
    Trotwood's McCray gets OSU offer despite verbal commit to Michigan
    May. 25
E-mail this page
December 5, 2009 | A Matter of Opinion
 

Home > Blogs > A Matter of Opinion > Archives > 2009 > December > 05

Saturday, December 5, 2009

Editorial: Shrinking income compounds jobs problem in Ohio

During the last six months, the number of jobs in Ohio has held pretty steady at about 5.1 million. The unemployment rate has ranged from 10.1 to 11.2 percent, because it’s a weird statistic.

The real numbers to look at when trying to get a feel for whether employment is really picking up — the big question of the day about the economy — are those relating to numbers of jobs.

By that score, Ohio isn’t doing all that badly — at least relatively speaking. Nationally, the total number of jobs continues to decline, although the drop in November was only 11,000, which is essentially flat.

According to a government report, from September to Oct. 21, states lost jobs. New York led with 15,300 lost. Florida lost 8,500. Georgia might be gaining NCR, but it lost 7,500 jobs net.

Ohio gained 1,400. That’s not to be taken as a sign of a turnaround; another marginal gain in recent months was wiped out by a subsequent drop. Still, it’s better than constantly dropping.

The report that had those figures has now been revived to show fewer lost jobs nationally, but it is still useful for comparing the states.

Meanwhile, there is other economic news on the positive side. The stock market is up. Big banks are paying back their government loans. Cars are selling. Home sales have been up sometimes.

One even hears of people actually landing jobs occasionally. And, yes, some people are buying Christmas presents.

Most important, the fear of last winter that the economy was crumbling into a full-fledged depression is gone.

Still, there’s a fear that good times aren’t coming back, not soon, anyway.

Everybody keeps saying that the last thing to improve as the economy grows will be the job situation. Actually, the last thing may be the salary situation.

Things have been so bad on the job front that little attention has been paid to how much people are being paid if they are fortunate enough to have a job.

Just before the financial collapse in the fall of 2008, median household incomes in Ohio had dropped by about $5,000 (9 percent) in this decade (according to a Cleveland Plain Dealer analysis of U.S. Census data).

The median was down even in states that didn’t used to have a lot of big auto factories. But it was particularly down in Ohio.

Wages generally fell in real value in Ohio in the 1980s, then rose through the 1990s. By the beginning of this recession, they were back down to where they were in the mid-1990s.

They must still be going down, given furloughs, salary cuts, hour cuts and staff cuts. The very fact that more people are unemployed tends to push salaries and wages down, because it’s an employer’s market.

The recession has also brought some prices down, which has helped consumers. But when prices turn back up, it’s a good bet that wages will be slower to do so.

President Barack Obama called a jobs summit for this week (and Newt Gingrich held his own in Cincinnati). The political leaders are saying that jobs are the big issue in the economy. They want to make sure that nobody sees them as too excited just because the stock market is up. And, yes, they make a good point.

But the truth is that a focus on jobs alone understates the problem.

Permalink | Comments (5) | Post your comment | Categories: Economy, Editorials, Martin Gottlieb

 

Copyright © 2011 Cox Media Group Ohio, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.