Home > Blogs > Uncorked (Skip to blog navigation.)
By Uncorked
| Friday, May 9, 2008, 06:19 AM
One prominent Midwestern state has found a way to resolve its wine direct-shipping issues, and the resolution appears as if it will please wine consumers who are on the receiving end of some of those direct-from-the-winery shipments, according to this Wines & Vines story entitled “Illinois Opens to Direct Shipping.”
The new Illinois law also allows small wine producers to bypass wine wholesalers and distribute their wines directly to retailers — something that to my understanding, would NOT be legal in Ohio under current laws (correct me if I’m wrong). What impact would it have in Ohio if we were to embrace such a law?
Illinois lawmakers didn’t embrace free-market openness entirely: The Illinois law also appears to prohibit out-of-state wine retailers from shipping directly to Illinois consumers through the Internet.
The Ohio General Assembly is contemplating changes in the Buckeye state’s wine laws. Anybody know the latest on these efforts? And what do you think of the Illinois law?
Mark Fisher
Permalink
| Comments (1)
| Post your comment
More:
wine shipping
By Uncorked
| Friday, May 9, 2008, 06:11 AM
Your best and brightest wine tastings and events listing, courtesy of a Dayton-based wine listserv, is your with but a click of your mouse …. Can life get any better?
Continue reading "A wine-drenched weekend in May"...
Permalink
| Comments (0)
| Post your comment
By Uncorked
| Thursday, May 8, 2008, 06:57 AM
One of the ancient vines that are a common sight in the vineyards of Lodi.
I have finally blown the dust and the mold (was that botrytis?) off of the notes from my trip to California a month ago and wrote a wine column that will run in Friday’s Dayton Daily News. But once again, you Uncorked readers are SO special that you get a sneak-peek. I hope to write in greater detail about Lodi and its wineries and wines here on Uncorked in the coming days, but in the meantime ….
LODI, Calif. — A handful of California wine-producing regions — Santa “Sideways” Barbara and Paso Robles come to mind — have taken their turn in the “new,” “hot” or “up-and-coming” spotlight in recent years, striving to join the ranks of the Napa and Sonoma heavyweights.
But watch out. There’s a new kid in town — a surprising contender that no one thought could ever rub shoulders with the big boys. Suddenly, the underdog has blossomed and is ready to rumble.
Say hello to Lodi. Yes, Lodi.
For decades, this was the bulk-wine capital of California, where flat terrain and fertile soil nurtured vast acreage of vineyards to produce mammoth yields of grapes whose juice went into jug wines and other mass-produced brands. The Lodi region’s annual yield of 600,000 tons comprises nearly one-fifth of the entire state’s wine production — more than Napa and Sonoma combined. The focus was definitely on quantity, though the quality was by no means shabby. Just a bit diluted, perhaps.
Through the 1980s and 1990s, though, some winemakers and grape-growers started looking toward other wine regions that were enhancing the quality (not to mention prestige and — ahem — prices) of their wines and figured, “Why not us?” They started irrigating less, pruning more, dropping fruit during the growing season to concentrate flavors, and taking other steps to boost quality.
And it worked.
You can taste the results in widely available wines such as Seven Deadly Zins, 6th Sense Syrah, Incognito and Earthquake wines from the Michael David Winery, the region’s highest-profile quality leader. You can also taste it in the wines of several emerging stars such as Macchia, makers of several zinfandels from various parts of Lodi and the Sierra Foothills and of Italian varietals suh as nebbiolo, sangiovese and barbera; Borra Vineyards, which produces stunning Rhone blends it calls simply Red Fusion and White Fusion; and Jessie’s Grove, makers of a fine white Rhone blend and an inexpensive ($12.99) zin it playfully calls “Earth Zin & Fire.”
The best place to sample Lodi’s quality renaissance is at the source. The region is easy to get to — it’s 90 miles east of San Francisco. The tasting rooms are uncrowded, and most don’t charge for samples. Unlike Santa Barbara and Paso Robles, the wineries are fairly close together, and in between visits, you’ll drive by some of the most beautiful, gnarled old vines (some well over a century old) that you’ll find anywhere.
There are, however, a few signs of growing pains: a handful of wineries have let success go to their heads and are mimicking their colleagues in other California wine-producing regions by releasing highly extracted, over-oaked reserve wines at prices heretofore unheard of in Lodi.
Let’s hope that virus doesn’t spread.
Lodi’s best wines exhibit the region’s signature attributes of lush, forward fruit with comparatively low tannins. The wines seem perfectly in tune with what today’s new generation of wine consumers is looking for. And the quality-price ratio is very, very attractive.
Score another victory for the underdog.
— For more about Lodi and its wineries, check out www.lodiwine.com.
(Photo by Mark Fisher)
Permalink
| Comments (3)
| Post your comment
More:
California wines
By Uncorked
| Wednesday, May 7, 2008, 09:02 AM
No reason whatsoever for you to read any fancy schmancy prose I might come up with — at least, not on this day, when the freshest wine post on the internet is so compelling. It’s entitled Wine’s Pleasures: Are They All in Your Head?, and it’s written by New York Times wine guy Eric Asimov, he of The Pour wine-blogging fame (there’s a link to Eric’s blog now on the right-hand side of Uncorked, under “Other wine blogs”).
The piece explores the nuances — and there are many — of the recent studies that suggest many wine drinkers prefer less expensive wines when tasting blind, and that the perception of a wine’s taste can depend on what we’re told about the wine’s price. It’s fascinating stuff, and none of the issues are black-and-white.
Take a look at Eric’s piece and let us know where you stand.
Mark Fisher
Permalink
| Comments (3)
| Post your comment
More:
wine appreciation
By Uncorked
| Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 06:37 PM
As one Uncorked commenter noticed and pointed out yesterday, Tom Wark, author of Fermentation who has done more than any other human being to further the cause of wine blogging in America, scraped the bottom of the wine barrel yesterday and threw a spotlight on Uncorked.
Careful — the picture may blind you.
Tom has a bit of fun with the interview questions, and I, well, yes, I MIGHT have had a little fun back …
Mark Fisher
Permalink
| Comments (2)
| Post your comment
By Uncorked
| Monday, May 5, 2008, 06:49 AM
An alert reader who noticed the robust response to our Uncorked entry of 10 days ago entitled “Clive Coates slams Parker, Wine Spectator and ‘emasculated’ wine trade” shared an email he received from high-profile Siduri, the Sonoma-based winery that makes several highly regarded pinots from throughout California and Oregon. With a subject line that simply said, “Some Thoughts from Siduri Wines,” here’s how one California winery tackles the wine-ratings conundrum (and the issue of very divergent wine reviews of its wines) head-on, directly with its customers.See if you find it the breath of fresh air that I did.
Dear Friends,
We wanted to chat a bit with each one of you about the press, wine reviews, and Siduri Wines. As you may recall, we introduced the last newsletter writing about the press and the power of wine reviews. We wrote, “ We always have to be cautious that our excitement for reviews doesn’t become so consuming that we start to produce wines with these reviews in mind. Nor can the success of our sales efforts be wholly determined by reviews. With both Siduri and Novy we are committed to doing everything possible to produce wines that we believe in. We want to make wines of increasing complexity that are the finest possible representations of the place and the vintage. We are also committed to selling these wines honestly, certainly using reviews at times, but also selling the wines based on their merits and honestly representing what we think of their quality.”
These comments were especially prescient as we have recently received a slew of interesting and very divergent reviews. Here is some of what is being said:
2006 SiduriChehalemMountainPinot Noir ($29)
90 Points, Wine Spectator : “Smooth, harmonious, and appealing….Has style and transparency.”
87 Points, Connoisseurs’ Guide to California Wine : “…if not one for finesse, either now or in the foreseeable future….”
;
2006 Siduri Sonatera Vineyard Pinot Noir ($49)
95 Points, Connoisseurs’ Guide to California Wine: “…this opus from the Sonoma Coast is a rich and lavishly filled wine whose impressive complement of very deep and delicious fruit comes with no debt to overdone ripeness.”
88 Points, Wine Spectator : “This is marked by herb and cola flavors….that turns delicate
2006 Siduri Rosella’s Vineyard Pinot Noir ($48)
93 Points, Connoisseurs’ Guide to California Wine : “…A classy and complete package that ranks among Siduri’s best efforts in 2006
85 Points, Wine Spectator : “Dried herb, cola, and sassafras flavors thin out on the finish”.
So, as a consumer, how are you supposed to make sense of such wildly varying thoughts on our wines? Here are a few suggestions:
1) Taste the wines and decide for yourself. Honestly (and obviously) there is no greater indicator of quality than your own palate. Many smaller wineries are not open for tasting but we believe very strongly that we need to make our wines available for you to taste. Accordingly, we are open 7 days a week, from 10 am to 3pm, by appointment for tasting. Anytime you want to come by and taste we encourage you to do so. And, should you want to taste a specific wine we encourage you to ask about it and we will do our best to accommodate your request.
2) Attend one of our Open Houses. We have numerous events throughout the year (the next one being the huge 10 th Anniversary Novy Party on June 7 at the winery). At these Open Houses we pour a huge range of wines so that you can taste them side by side and decide for yourself which ones you prefer.
3) We realize that for those of you who live away from the Bay Area it is not so easy to just come up to the winery and taste. Consequently, those of us that work at the winery are spending quite a bit of time on the road selling wine and, in every market, attempting to do winemaker dinners, public tastings, etc. We attempt to email each of you to let you know when we are coming but if you would like a full listing of our current travel plans you can always reach out to us at vino@siduri.com.
4) We also attempt to make it easy for you to sample our wines. Unlike some wineries, we don’t have minimum orders, bundled offerings, hostage wines, or any of those other practices that bother us too. And we are happy to hold your wines here at the winery, consolidating orders until you’ve reached a quantity that saves you some money on shipping.
5) Finally, please take the time to get to know those of us that work selling wine at the winery. You can always reach out for Jody ( jody@siduri.com ), Kate ( kate@siduri.com ), Jonathan ( jonathan@siduri.com ), Jeff ( jeff@siduri.com ), Dianna ( dianna@siduri.com ), or me ( adam@siduri.com ). We are all more than happy to share with you our honest thoughts on all of the wines (we have favorites and not-so-favorites ourselves), get to know your particular tastes, and recommend wines that we think you would like. Despite the obvious self-interest involved, we have truly found that it not only makes us feel better about ourselves but is really in the best business interest of the company to only recommend wines that we honestly think you would like.
We hope that this is interesting to you all. Please feel free to reach out to any of us should we be able to help you at all with any of our wines. And should you want to see for yourself what the wines taste like we have attached an order form below. You can send that in by return email to vino@siduri.com , call us with an order at 707-578-3884, or fax it to 707-578-3884. Thanks for your continued support.
Cheers,
Adam & Dianna Lee and Everybody at Siduri & Novy Wineries
So, what do you think? Were those reviewers tasting the same wines? When’s the last time you saw a winery call attention to wildly divergent reviews of their wines? And if wine distributors and retailers took the same approach as that of Siduri, would Clive Coates still call the wine trade “emasculated?”
Just wondering …
Mark Fisher
Permalink
| Comments (9)
| Post your comment
By Uncorked
| Friday, May 2, 2008, 07:03 AM
Um, that would be, um, me.
I mean, all blogs have certain minimum requirements that all of my cyberspace colleagues seem to be able to meet with no sweat: An up-to-the-minute “blog roll” of reciprocal links to other wine blogs … an easy system to categorize entries so readers can view previous posts in each category … an updated list of “favorite posts” … links to other web sites of interest … just basic Wine Blogging 101 stuff.
Well, I’m ashamed to say I’ve flunked Wine Blogging 101. I launched Uncorked two-and-a-half years ago (my how time do fly) with the single-minded (too single-minded) focus on content, content, content, providing daily or near daily posts on all things wine. Those other blog basics I basically banished to the back burner with the thought I would do them “next week.”
Oh, I did make a half-hearted attempt to build a blog roll and throw in a few favorite posts, then left them to go stale over the course of, I don’t know, a couple of years. To my horror, I went through the blog roll yesterday and found several of the blogs I “recommended” went dormant months, even years, earlier. My “favorite posts” had mold growing on them.
Worst, those items weren’t even appearing on the Uncorked “Index Page” that most of you find first, and which features the first parts of the previous half-dozen posts. The blog roll, favorite posts, and links to other web sites appeared only if readers clicked on one of the posts to read comments or the “jump” — the portion of the story viewable after clicking on “Continue reading.”
Well, my Cox colleagues who know a lot more about online stuff are working to diagnose and fix that problem, and I have gotten off my duff and started the process of updating the blog basics I mentioned. If you can suggest a good wine blog or wine-related web site I should link to, please do make that suggestion via a comment or an email to mfisher@daytondailynews.com.
I promise to do better — while continuing the commitment (or is it obsession?) with frequent posts and new content. Which leads me to the content you’ll find here on Uncorked virtually every Friday: The best darn list of wine tastings, dinners and special events assembled anywhere. Best part is, I can take no credit — ZEE-roe — for compiling it. That credit belongs to the Dayton-based wine listserv that painstakingly collects and records these listings for its members, and then allows Uncorked to copy and paste each week for this web site’s readers. For info on Cincinnati-area wine tastings and events, go to my friend Michelle’s My Wine Education blog. And for the Dayton-based listserv’s list, click on “continue reading” below.
Meanwhile, I’ll continue working to shed that “world’s worst” label. I aspire to be … the second worst.
Mark Fisher
Continue reading "The world’s worst wine blogger"...
Permalink
| Comments (1)
| Post your comment
More:
wine tastings & dinners
Back to top
More entries...
Jenna Bush wedding preps
2007 Dayton Urban League Gala
Kings Island photos
Latest comment
If I read the article correctly, it is protectionism disguised under another name: it is to protect