The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Group praises Lion Apparel for sweatshop awareness

Response to complaints about a plant draws rights organization’s applause.

Asphalt can only be sealed; only concrete is resurfaced
10:43 a.m.
Dollar stores get wider range of customers
10:32 a.m.
Honda gets a double-shot of good consumer news
10:30 a.m.
Anthem puts emphasis on quality
10:29 a.m.
UD researcher uses know-how to photograph local eagles
5/25/12
> More headlines

By Thomas Gnau, Staff Writer Updated 11:36 PM Thursday, April 16, 2009

An organization fighting what it calls “sweatshops” is praising Dayton-based Lion Apparel for its response to complaints about conditions in a Honduras plant.

In “Subsidizing Sweatshops II,” a report embargoed until Wednesday, April 15, SweatFree Communities said a research partner last year compiled complaints from workers, including “below-minimum wages, forced overtime, lack of legally mandated Social Security payments and pregnancy testing.”

The plant, in Siguatepeque, Honduras, employs about 500 workers, making public employee uniforms for Lion Apparel, headquartered on Poe Avenue, Mason’s Cintas Corp. and Fechheimer Brothers Co., the report said.

The organization said Lion initially said its own audits found no evidence of violations.

“However, the company also signaled an openness to consider any new evidence that may come to light and to take corrective action as necessary,” the report added, referring to Lion.

The report also praises Steve Schwartz, chief executive and fourth-generation owner of Lion Apparel, for writing and distributing a letter to workers at the plant.

The letter, quoted in part in the report, said Lion Apparel will accept “suggestions and truthful and sincere complaints” from current workers. Schwartz also said Lion will not respond to any complaints by withdrawing business from the plant.

In a statement released Wednesday, Lion said follow-up assessments showed that “many” of SweatFree’s claims were “misrepresentations.” The statement did not identify which claims the company felt were misleading.

“Should anyone care to visit the facility, they will find a clean, well-lit, well-ventilated manufacturing facility that provides legally compliant wages and benefits to its employees,” Schwartz said in the statement.

Share this article