The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Home  >  News  >  Local News Continuing coverage Solid rock church

Response to statue reveals schism between evangelical and mainstream Christians

Hot Topics

Related

By Mary McCarty, Staff Writer 10:41 PM Saturday, July 24, 2010

The 62-foot King of Kings statue has been a lightning rod long before it was destroyed by a thunderbolt.

From Heywood Banks’ “Big Butter Jesus” ditty to front-page New York Times stories, the statue served as a national icon to some, a national laughingstock to others.

But it seemed surprising that the snarkiness and cynicism only ratcheted up after such a major loss for the congregation. Typically, a church fire draws out only sympathy and support, so why the mean-spirited, even gleeful response from some quarters?

Solid Rock co-pastor Lawrence Bishop explains it simply: “Because that’s the way people are.”

But theologians, political scientists and religious history scholars find far more complicated explanations, and they have followed the unfolding story with fascination.

The statue’s unavoidable, unapologetic, in-your-face presence has made it symbolic, for some, of American evangelical Christianity. Many believe the caustic comments reveal a growing schism between evangelicals and mainstream Christians.

“If you take the statue as a symbol of American evangelism, and then the lightning bolt as a traditional way of talking about God’s judgment, you can see how easy it is for people to read something into it,” observed Ava Chamberlain, an associate professor of religion at Wright State University. “The statue displays how evangelical Christianity has become more and more powerful in American life and more and more powerful in American politics. It’s not just atheists and people of other faiths who are uncomfortable with that, but non-evangelical Christians.”

Vincent Miller, a Catholic theology professor at the University of Dayton, said that a congregation’s grief warrants more compassion, but in the public’s eye “the event itself just cries out for a humorous response, which can be mocking or a way of dealing with the striking nature of what happened.”

Many mainstream Christians feel profound ambivalence about the megachurches sprouting up in the suburbs, Miller noted: “It’s about styles of Christianity. There’s a longstanding discomfort with extravagant expressions of faith, and concerns about whether the money would be better spent on the poor. That’s not a new question.”

What is new, he said, is the viral culture of the Internet “and the new kind of media where everybody puts their spin on it. It encourages people with the sharp takes to say something witty or snarky. The moderate responses don’t get shared.”

John Feldmeier, an associate professor of political science at WSU, said that the reaction would have been far different if anyone had been injured or killed or the church more substantially damaged: “Given that context, it falls into the longstanding tradition of satire in the U.S., in which people take aim at or poke fun at large blocks of power.”

The practical explanation for the statue’s destruction was summed up in a Dayton Daily News Speak Up comment on the Opinion page: “I’m an engineer. They built a lightning rod that was covered with a flammable material. This had nothing to do with a sign from above.”

Still, many seem irresistibly drawn to finding other meanings — including Bishop himself, who said the firestorm of publicity has spread the name of Jesus around the world.

Chamberlain isn’t surprised that Bishop reacted that way to such a significant event in the life of his congregation: “There’s a very old tradition in American Christianity that God has a plan for everything, that God’s providence lies behind everything, that God directs all events. This is deeply rooted in American religious culture, going back to the Puritans who saw a big storm or tornado or earthquake or fire as particular acts of God’s judgment. That carries on even to this day, when there’s a tendency to interpret events as having divine significance.”

Contact this reporter at (937) 225-2209 or mmccarty@Dayton
DailyNews.com.

Full Lace Front Wig, Long & Short Hair Wigs: 80% OFF at Celebrity Wigs. We ensure 100% customer satisfaction with our Long & Short Indian Remy Hair Wigs.
<a href="http://www.weddingsale.ca/">wedding dresses</a>

cosplay
3:08 AM, 8/3/2010
The bible tells us that, as christians we are supposed to give 10 percent of our best to god's storehouse. If everyone in the church gives what they ought to, a church of 3500 people would take in lots of money. If the people that run the church are conncerned about orphanages and missions that is a great thing. But why are people worried about a half million dollar music auditorium and a 1/4 million dollar statue. I will be praying for those pastors and congregants at that church
believer
2:01 PM, 7/28/2010
I am a member at Solid Rock Church we DON'T flaunt our money we give 2 very many Churches around the world also we have an orphange in Brazil for children that have been abused in very crude ways, we also have The Darlene Bishop Home For Life,which is 2 help young and older women if they have no place 2 live. I am only 17 years old & this is the Best Church i have ever attended in my entire life and it hurts to see how people judge our church by what they hear instead of seeing for themselves.
Breanna Barnes
7:54 PM, 7/27/2010
I totally agree with Adam. If this Chruch did not have the money that it does and was not able to build such elaborate structures, but still had the same beliefs would the same people still attend. Why is the Huge Jesus structure necessary? We all know who you believe in. Please spend the money on people and things that really need it. It saddens lots of society that you are using others money so selfishly. Think of others, not just yourselves. Don't be so showy.
Concerned
9:31 AM, 7/27/2010
I just think the whole thing is sickening. When a church has THAT much money to flaunt, something is up.
Also - Why in the world rebuild the statue. And if it was insured, which I understand that it WAS, they WHY are they seeking donations to rebuild it?
Seems a little odd to me.
But then again....they are VERY odd.
American Made
1:01 PM, 7/26/2010
There are 32 additional comments
SHOW ALL
We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



Comments are limited to 500 characters


500 character limit

Incorrect please try again


These words come from scanned books.
Entering them helps digitize old texts.


Breaking news by e-mail

Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.

See Sample | Privacy Policy
View All

Top Jobs



About our ads

About our ads

Copyright © Fri Sep 10 16:44:45 EDT 2010 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads. You may wish to note our other business policies.