- Home
- Local News
- Sports
- Business
- Entertainment
- Life
- Opinion
- Photos & Video
- Help
- Jobs
- Cars
- Homes
- Classifieds & Deals
- Local Directory
During an interrogation at Guantanamo Bay in April 2003, an Army psychologist watched while MPs pinned a detainee to his knees and then repeatedly slammed his upper body and face to the floor up to 30 times. A contractor who also witnessed the abuse said “the floor was shaking” from the force of the blows, according to a 2008 investigation by the Senate Armed Services Committee released in April.
The psychologist “believed that the technique was appropriate, approved, applied properly and was common practice in the teams.” The interrogator told the Senate investigator he agreed.
Col. Larry C. James, now retired from the Army, was the leader of the team of five psychologists assigned to Gitmo interrogators. James, who didn’t testify, says he never witnessed that incident nor any other abuse involving a health care professional during his deployments at Guantanamo from January to May 2003 and June 2007 to June 2008.
James, 52, a recipient of a Bronze Star Medal for his military service in Iraq and now dean of the School of Professional Psychology at Wright State University, has been under fire for several years by psychologists and human rights advocates. They doubt the effectiveness of his reforms at Gitmo and question whether he may have turned a blind eye to abusive practices there or perhaps even helped set abusive policies.
In the colonel’s defense
By his own statements, including those in his book “Fixing Hell,” James said he was sent by the Army “to clean up the abuses” at Gitmo and later the Abu Ghraib detention center in Iraq.
James said the worst abuses at Guantanamo occurred in 2002, before he arrived, when interrogators terrorized prisoners with guard dogs, resorted to waterboarding and withheld medications. “You have to understand the context” following 9/11, he said. “The nation had been attacked 6 to 8 months before, and the pressure from (the Bush administration) was to get intelligence, get intelligence, get intelligence.”
Kathy Platoni, a Centerville psychologist and Army Reservist who counseled soldiers at Gitmo from 2003 to 2004, has been a defender of James. Although she didn’t meet him until he arrived at Wright State, she said, “I will back him to the hilt.”
To suggest that James or any psychologist was involved in torture or inhumane treatment of detainees is “absurd and offensive,” Platoni said. On the contrary, she said, military personnel at Gitmo were often subject to abuse from prisoners, who frequently hurled bodily fluids, excrement and insults from their cells.
Complaints against James
Trudy Bond, a Toledo psychologist who has taken legal action against James, said documents and media reports show that “torture and abuse of detainees never stopped at Guantanamo.” Bond has filed complaints against James with the state psychological boards in Ohio and Louisiana where James holds licenses. Both boards have declined to investigate, saying there is not enough evidence.
Bond went to court in Louisiana to force the state board to investigate James. The court dismissed the case in August, saying Bond had not exhausted the board’s administrative process. Bond and her attorney have appealed in federal court.
For several years, members of the American Psychological Association have been embroiled in debate over the role James and other military psychologists may have played in detainee interrogations under the Bush administration. Bush critics in the APA charge that the White House used the supervision of psychologists and other health care professionals to legitimize interrogation techniques outlawed by the U.S. Constitution and the international Geneva Conventions. Their presence was supposed to prevent permanent physical or psychological harm.
In June 2007, 350 members of the APA signed an open letter to then-APA President Sharon Brehm asking the association to investigate James and other members of the APA who served at Guantanamo Bay. The letter alleges that “psychologists played an integral role in the development, justification and implementation of abusive interrogation techniques.” Brehm declined, but the association later changed its ethics code to ban involvement in specific forms of torture.
One claim: To support their claims, APA activists point to a July 13, 2003, e-mail from the Gitmo commander to Army superiors, a weekly update that also was forwarded to Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz at his request. The e-mail said that Lt. Col. Luie “Morgan” Banks, a Ft. Bragg psychologist who trained U.S. soldiers in how to resist torture, had been brought to Gitmo to offer advice to interrogators on how “to fracture... detainee resistance to cooperation.”
The commander’s e-mail, cited by Senate investigators, said Banks provided “very valuable insights.”
James’ response: Having known Banks for more than 20 years, James said his colleague has been unfairly blamed by critics who allege he developed ways to turn around Army torture survival techniques and use them for breaking down detainees. “We were both adamant that torture and abuse were the wrong way to go” for effective interrogations, James said.
Excerpts from the book by Col. (Ret.) Larry C. James, Ph.D., with Gregory A. Freeman (Grand Central, 2008)
Pages 5-6: The American (interrogator) was slumped in her chair and had tears in her eyes as the prisoner yelled at her ferociously in Arabic... “In my country a b--- like you would be beheaded for looking in the eyes of a man like me!”... I felt sorry for this young soldier. As I watched her, I realized the reports of prisoner abuse, as bad as they were, did not tell the full story of Abu Ghraib. This, too, was Abu Ghraib.
Page 55: The technique I taught Luther (an Army interrogator) was just one way we got prisoners to talk without anything remotely abusive. Much of the culture at Gitmo in 2002 and 2003, perhaps due to the anger over 9/11, involved projecting one’s rage onto the detainees. My role was to teach rapport and relationship-building approaches between the detainee and interrogator without the abuse. Simple things like kindness, sweets, pizza, cigarettes, movies, tea and magazines went a long way in fostering these relationships.
Page 69: At that precise moment (in April 2004), TV images (from Agu Ghraib) of naked dog piles, an Iraqi prisoner standing with a hangman’s noose around his neck, and K-9 dogs terrorizing detainees were forever etched in my memory... I felt both sick and furious. As I lay back down on the sofa (at my home), I wondered how this could have happened after everything we did at Gitmo.
Age: 52
Residences: Beavercreek, New Orleans and Honolulu
Military Rank: Army Colonel, retired 2008
Previous Positions: Chair, Dept. of Psychology, Tripler Medical Center, Honolulu, 2004 to 2008; Chair, Dept. of Psychology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, D.C., 1999-2004
Military Deployments: Senior Psychologist to Joint Intelligence Group, Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp, January 2003 to May 2003 and June 2007 to June 2008 and at Agu Ghraib Detention Center, June 2004 to November 2004.
Honors: Bronze Star Medal, 2004, for military service in Iraq; Defense Superior Service Medal, 2008, for distinguished service during 22 years in the Army; Presidential Citation, American Psychological Association, for distinguished service to the field of military psychology and the global war on terrorism.
Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.
See Sample | Privacy Policy
9:41 AM, 9/22/2009
7:34 PM, 9/21/2009
Thr critics are taking the word of a 16-year-old detainee with no other evidence to back up the claim. What, did they think a detainee would openly admit to being a terrorist?
7:31 PM, 9/21/2009
5:28 PM, 9/21/2009
3:24 PM, 9/20/2009