- Home
- Local News
- Sports
- Business
- Entertainment
- Life
- Opinion
- Photos & Video
- Help
- Jobs
- Cars
- Homes
- Classifieds & Deals
- Local Directory
In August, Ralph Rindler and his family applied for state permits to house 2.5 million hens at their Mercer County egg farm, up from the current 1.3 million.
That would make Rindler Poultry LLC the second largest egg farm in the nation’s second largest egg-producing state.
But the proposed expansion comes at a risky time.
The Humane Society of the United States recently turned its attention to Ohio after spearheading successful ballot initiatives that will phase out or modify some controversial housing practices for livestock and poultry in other states, including confinement of hens in cages.
That’s how hens are housed at Rindler Poultry and virtually all of Ohio’s other commercial egg farms, including those of Weaver Bros. Inc. in Darke and Logan counties.
Rindler is supporting what many farmers consider to be a more palatable alternative: Issue 2, a proposed constitutional amendment that would create a Livestock Care Standards Board.
It would prescribe standards for animal care.
Passing Issue 2 “gives us the security that the people of Ohio support agriculture so we can continue what our family loves to do, and that is to farm,” Rindler says, noting his egg operation employs 50 and indirectly provides work for hundreds more.
Opponents of Issue 2 argue otherwise.
They say lobbyists backed by large-scale livestock and poultry interests have gone “nuclear” in convincing legislators to ask voters Nov. 3 to amend the state constitution.
“Issue 2 will do nothing to stop (the Humane Society of the United States) from passing its own constitutional amendment,” predicted Sarah Alexander, spokeswoman for Ohio Against Constitutional Takeover.
While the Ohio Constitution authorizes a state board of education, boards typically aren’t prescribed in that document, said Charles Hallinan, a University of Dayton law professor and constitutional scholar.
“It’s an oddity,” Hallinan said of Issue 2. “It is unusual enough that it would give me pause to include it in the constitution.”
I received literature only a few days ago from the ASPCA telling me the harm Issue 2 will do. Why in the world would the ASPCA and The Humane Society wait so long in bringing this to light? I am sure there are others out there that were unaware of the lies!
9:15 PM, 11/3/2009
10:15 AM, 10/26/2009
The question is, who pays and who benefits? The clear beneficiaries are the very large companies that are after maximum profits at the expense of our health and environment.
We pay through loss of our democracy.
9:56 AM, 10/26/2009
9:26 AM, 10/26/2009
5:51 AM, 10/26/2009