- Home
- Local News
- Sports
- Business
- Entertainment
- Life
- Opinion
- Photos & Video
- Help
- Jobs
- Cars
- Homes
- Classifieds & Deals
- Local Directory
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appears sharply divided over whether sentencing a juvenile to life in prison with no chance of parole is cruel and unusual punishment, particularly if the crime is less serious than homicide.
The justices heard two hours of argument Monday in cases involving two Florida teenagers who are serving life prison terms for crimes other than murder.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that "because of immaturity, you can't really judge a teenager at the point of sentencing."
But Justice Samuel Alito wondered why someone who commits rape, but doesn't kill the victim must get a second chance.
The group Human Rights Watch says Ohio has two inmates who were sentenced to life for fatal crimes while they were juveniles.
___
November 09, 2009 06:12 PM EST
Copyright 2009, The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.
See Sample | Privacy Policy