The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Proposed delay of Ohio tax cuts spurs e-mails

Judge cuts off embattled SCLC treasurer
Updated 10 min. ago
Crash holds up funeral procession
Updated 13 min. ago
Mother’s defense says boyfriend abused her daughter in secret
Updated 16 min. ago
SunCoke receives permit from Ohio EPA
5:32 p.m.
Dayton, Fairfield malls closing early
5:18 p.m.
> More headlines

By STEPHEN MAJORS, The Associated Press Updated 6:41 PM Monday, November 9, 2009

COLUMBUS, Ohio — After Richard Handy of Fairfield received an e-mail from a conservative group calling Gov. Ted Strickland's proposed delay of Ohio's income tax cuts a "retroactive tax increase," Handy fired off a few passionate words to some state senators.

"I am absolutely against changing the rules in the middle of the game," wrote Handy in an Oct. 19 e-mail about Strickland's proposal to delay the final 4.2 percent reduction in income taxes to close an $850 million budget gap.

"I am sure the vast majority of Ohioans agree with me in opposing this idiotic proposal ... If Ohio needs more money, STOP SPENDING! That's what budgets are for."

An Associated Press public records request for constituent correspondence to legislative leaders on the tax proposal found that most was fueled by organized interests — the anti-tax group Americans for Prosperity that opposed it, and school teachers and employees and mental health service providers that supported it.

Some Republicans have argued that because current law has the last tax cut in place and because withholding for the tax year has already started, Strickland's tax proposal is a tax increase.

But the relatively light feedback from constituents in comparison to other legislative issues, including the budget earlier this year, suggests that most Ohioans are not particularly inflamed by the tax talk.

Lawmakers considering what to do about the budget gap received both dry form letters distributed among like-minded individuals and more personal — and sometimes humorous — pleas.

"CUT SPENDING! That's what my husband and I are doing, that's what my neighbors are doing," wrote Alice Martin of Huron to Republican Senate President Bill Harris of Ashland on Oct. 20. "I'll bet your wife could explain it to you!"

Peg Carter fired off a few quick words when she was crunched for time.

"I don't have much time here at the library internet because I have ice cream in the car," Carter wrote. "I dothink that Ohioans who are still working, are able to accept a tax freeze — in light of your pay cuts — in order to provide help for those who have lost their jobs because of the economy."

The tax proposal approved by the Democratic-controlled House and pending in the Republican-controlled Senate includes a 5 percent pay cut for lawmakers.

Teachers and employees from several school districts used form letters, the most common e-mails sent to legislative leaders on the issue. Democratic lawmakers have said that delaying the tax reduction will protect school funding from both state and federal cuts, even naming the proposal the Education Funding Protection Act.

"My district cannot afford to lose state and federal funding," Debra McRoberts of Westerville told Harris in an Oct. 19 missive. "This will force our district to reduce learning opportunities for students and lead to further elimination of education employees."

The same letter was sent to Harris and House Speaker Armond Budish, D-Beachwood, from school personnel in Mount Vernon, Perrysburg, Sunbury, Shelby, Mansfield and other towns.

Many e-mails sent to Republican leaders opposing the tax proposal called it a "retroactive tax increase," a description the Strickland administration said is inaccurate. Several constituents said they received an e-mail from Americans for Prosperity describing it as "retroactive."

The state constitution bans retroactive laws. And Ohio Department of Taxation spokesman John Kohlstrand noted that "retroactive" is a legal term. He said a retroactive tax hike would be, for example, if lawmakers changed the tax rate for the 2008 tax year after that year is over.

___

November 09, 2009 11:36 PM EST

Share this article

ADD COMMENT

Comments feed

And you would know about complaining Jim! So far you've complained about Bush, Taft & Blackwell! All people who are no longer in office! Quit living in the past. Nobody cares about them now!

Amy
4:20 PM, 11/10/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Well Jim to begin with, the federal Govt can start with reforming welfare, sending illegals back to Mexico & stop giving them free healthcare, then maybe capping malpractice suits filed against doctors. These would all help our state budgets as well, AND we wouldn't need a govt healthcare takeover. But hey, why fix the problem, right Jim?

Spare me
4:13 PM, 11/10/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Jim,
You're an ignoranus! It's obvious you're a member of the dumbmasses.

Friar
4:07 PM, 11/10/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Shirley wrote,
"Perhaps people should get together and throw out these corrupt politicians"

This why we have elections Shirley. You're side lost, and lost big. 60%-36% Of course you believe Brunner "helped fixed" it, because you can't accept the loss. Do you really think Ken Blackwell would be dealing with the budget crisis any better? The budget problem isn't any one parties or one persons fault.

Jim
4:00 PM, 11/10/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Ohio is a scary place to live about now. Jennifer Brunner helped fixed the last election, and Strickland is helping us by taking our tax money even though it's supposed to belong to us. Perhaps people should get together and throw out these corrupt politicians. Should we starve our government and stop paying taxes? How about we deregulate everything, make everything legal except for murder and stealing, and then throw out all of the government officials on their behinds?

Shirley
2:41 PM, 11/10/2009

REPORT ABUSE

There are 16 additional comments

SHOW ALL

We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.