The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Home  >  News  >  Politics

Tobacco ruling punches $258M hole in budget

Governor says he’ll appeal ruling giving more money to anti-smoking programs.

Hot Topics

By William Hershey, Staff Writer Updated 7:06 AM Wednesday, August 12, 2009

COLUMBUS — There’s a $258 million hole in the state budget, and Robert G. Miller Jr. couldn’t be happier about his role in blowing it open.

Miller, 52, from the Toledo area, kicked a two-pack-a-day cigarette habit with the help of a program paid for with money from the Ohio Tobacco Prevention Foundation’s endowment.

He and David Weinmann, another ex-smoker, sued after Gov. Ted Strickland and the legislature closed down the foundation and tried to shift the money away from anti-smoking programs.

On Tuesday, Aug. 11, Franklin County Common Pleas Judge David Fais nixed the plan in the new state budget to use the anti-smoking money for social service programs, including expanded heath care coverage for children, breast and cervical cancer screenings, county child welfare programs, and optional adult medical services such as dental and optical treatment.

“I felt this (anti-smoking) was a very valuable program. It was funded by money from the (national) tobacco settlement,” said Miller, whose suit was backed by the anti-smoking American Legacy Foundation. “They were making a commitment ... to dismantle it. It just didn’t seem like the right thing to do at all.”

Strickland plans to appeal and said Fais’ decision “will delay or jeopardize” essential health services for Ohioans, according to Amanda Wurst, Strickland’s spokeswoman.

In his ruling, Fais said the state eight years ago created the foundation’s endowment as an “irrevocable trust.” Legislation to liquidate the endowment was unconstitutional because it tried to retroactively abolish the program.

“Depleting of the Endowment Fund and discontinuance or reduction of the tobacco prevention and cessation programs funded by the Endowment Fund, would result in a substantial increase in tobacco-related premature death and disease in Ohio,” Fais wrote.

Strickland and lawmakers last year passed legislation to use money generated by liquidating the endowment for economic stimulus programs. They shifted gears this year, however, and in the new state budget set the money aside for the social service programs.

State support for stop-smoking programs has declined from $40 million last year to $6 million this year, Wurst said.

“They will continue to provide some tobacco cessation programs, despite the limited resources in this budget,” Wurst said.

This not about smoking cessation programs, it’s about the deceptiveness of government taking away funds for their original intent. The state of Ohio wants every dime they can get their hand on to maintain BIG government.
JPB
9:50 AM, 8/12/2009
Never quite understood the need for large dollars spent for a program to help anyone quit smoking. I was 30 year pack a day smoker, put them down one day and never went back. I did, however, spend approximately $15.00 on several packs of gum for the first few weeks. But - the money is earmarked, so rather than putting it in the general fund, earmark the endowment again to help widows/widowers with healthcare benefits for themselves and children that are the victims of cancer caused by smoking?
Kim
8:51 AM, 8/12/2009
I don't think one red cent should be spent on convincing a grown up to quit smoking. Smokers are idiots and do themselves in. There's no need to spend money to convince people to quit smoking. HOWEVER, I agree the judge's ruling on this one. The money was given to Ohio for the express purpose of helping reduce smoking.

"a substantial increase in tobacco-related premature death" - That's just Darwin in action!
jacob
7:18 AM, 8/12/2009
But it is for the children!
Won't someone think of the children?
as the government takes all the money it can and wastes it on useless social spending. Holes in the budget should be fixed by cutting spending, not raising taxes or from raiding earmarked funds. Strickland has almost done a good job of cutting some spending, only his cuts didn't go deep enough.
The tobacco settlement money should not go into the general fund. If there are shortages try not spending money on useless b.s.
Barry
11:32 PM, 8/11/2009
We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



Comments are limited to 500 characters


500 character limit

Incorrect please try again


These words come from scanned books.
Entering them helps digitize old texts.


Breaking news by e-mail

Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.

See Sample | Privacy Policy

About our ads

About our ads

Copyright © Wed Feb 10 02:39:55 EST 2010 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads. You may wish to note our other business policies.