Home > Blogs > Book Nook > Archives > 2008 > December > 28 > Entry
Oprah gets duped again…
Once bitten, twice shy; or not. Oprah Winfrey has apparently been plugging another bogus memoir. You would think that her people would do a better job of checking these bogus books out before Oprah starts praising them.
Check out the book’s cover; it proclaims that this new book is a “true story”. Do you remember how angry Oprah became with James Frey for his imaginary memoir when she found out that “A Million Little Pieces” was more fiction than fact?
Here’s a report from the New York Times:
This time it’s a bogus Holocaust memoir:
December 29, 2008
False Memoir of Holocaust Is Canceled
By MOTOKO RICH and JOSEPH BERGER
A man whose memoir about his experience during the Holocaust was to have been published in February has admitted that his story was embellished, and on Saturday evening his publisher canceled the release of the book.
And once again a New York publisher and Oprah Winfrey were among those fooled by a too-good-to-be-true story.
This time, it was the tale of Herman Rosenblat, who said he first met his wife while he was a child imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp and she, disguised as a Christian farm girl, tossed apples over the camp’s fence to him. He said they met again on a blind date 12 years after the end of war in Coney Island and married. The couple celebrated their 50th anniversary this year.
Ms. Winfrey, who hosted Mr. Rosenblat and his wife, Roma Radzicki Rosenblat, on her show twice, called their romance “the single greatest love story” she had encountered in her 22 years on the show. On Saturday night, after learning from Mr. Rosenblat’s agent that the author had confessed that the story was fabricated, Berkley Books, a unit of Penguin Group that was planning to publish “Angel at the Fence,” Mr. Rosenblat’s memoir of surviving in a sub-camp of Buchenwald with the help of his future wife, canceled the book and demanded that Mr. Rosenblat return his advance.
Harris Salomon, who is producing a movie based on the story, said he would go ahead with the film, but as a work of fiction, adding that Mr. Rosenblat had agreed to donate all earnings from the film to Holocaust survivor charities.
Berkley’s decision came in the same year that another unit of Penguin, Riverhead Books, was duped by Margaret Seltzer, the author of “Love and Consequences,” her fabricated gang memoir about her life as a white girl taken into an African-American foster home in South Central Los Angeles. She had in fact been raised by her biological family in a well-to-do section of the San Fernando Valley. It also followed the revelations, nearly three years ago, that James Frey, the Oprah Winfrey-annointed author “A Million Little Pieces,” had exaggerated details of his memoir of drug addiction.
This latest literary hoax is likely to trigger yet more questions as to why the publishing industry has such a poor track record of fact-checking.
In the latest instance, no one at Berkley questioned the central truth of Mr. Rosenblat’s story until last week, said Andrea Hurst, his agent. Neither Leslie Gelbman, president and publisher of Berkley, nor Natalee Rosenstein, Mr. Rosenblat’s editor at Berkley, returned calls or e-mail messages seeking comment. Craig Burke, director of publicity for Berkley, declined to elaborate beyond the company’s brief statement announcing the cancellation of the book. In an e-mail message, a spokesman for Ms. Winfrey also declined to comment.
After several scholars and family members attacked Mr. Rosenblat’s story in articles last week in The New Republic, Mr. Rosenblat confessed on Saturday to Ms. Hurst and Mr. Salomon that he had concocted the core of his tale. Ms. Hurst said that in an emotional telephone call with herself and Mr. Salomon, Mr. Rosenblat said his wife had never tossed him apples over the fence.
In a statement released through his agent, Mr. Rosenblat wrote that he had once been shot during a robbery and that while he was recovering in the hospital, “my mother came to me in a dream and said that I must tell my story so that my grandchildren would know of our survival from the Holocaust.”
He said that after the incident he began to write. “I wanted to bring happiness to people, to remind them not to hate, but to love and tolerate all people,” he wrote in the statement. “I brought good feelings to a lot of people and I brought hope to many. My motivation was to make good in this world. In my dreams, Roma will always throw me an apple, but I now know it is only a dream.”
According to Ms. Hurst, who represents other inspirational writers including Bernie Siegel, author of “Love, Medicine & Miracles,” Mr. Rosenblat first concocted his story in the mid 1990s as an entry to a newspaper contest soliciting the “best love stories.” In 1996, he appeared on Ms. Winfrey’s show with his wife and repeated the fabricated story. From there, it snowballed, with versions appearing in magazines, a volume of the “Chicken Soup for the Soul” series, and a children’s book, “Angel Girl,” by Laurie Friedman, released in September by an imprint of Lerner Publishing. Mr. and Mrs. Rosenblat, who now live in North Miami Beach, appeared on CBS’s “Early Show” in October.
As media coverage of Mr. Rosenblat’s story spread, scholars and others began to question the veracity of the romance throughout the blogosphere, pointing out that, among other things, the layout of the camp would have prevented the pair from meeting at a fence.
In a telephone interview in November, Mr. Rosenblat defended his story against such doubts. He said that his section of Schlieben, a sub-camp of Buchenwald, was not well guarded and that he could stand between a barracks and the six-to-eight-foot fence out of sight of guards. Roma was able to approach him because there were woods that would have concealed her.
In recounting the stunning “reunion” with Ms. Radzicki 12 years later as survivors living in New York, Mr. Rosenblat said Ms. Radzicki told him she had saved a boy by hurling apples over a fence to him.
“Did he have rags on his feet instead of shoes?” Mr. Rosenblat said he asked her.
She said yes and he told her, “That boy was me.”
In a telephone interview Sunday, Ms. Hurst, who sold the book to Berkley for less than $50,000, said she always believed the essential truth of Mr. Rosenblat’s tale until last week. “I believed the teller,” Ms. Hurst said. “He was in so many magazines and books and on ‘Oprah.’ It did not seem like it would not be true.” On Sunday, Ms. Hurst said that she was reviewing her legal options because “I’ve yet to see what kind of repercussions could come from this, and I was lied to.”
Ms. Hurst said that Mr. Rosenblat did provide some documentation, including a 1946 letter from a warden with the Jewish Children’s Community Committee for the Care of Children From the Camps that said Mr. Rosenblat had attended a technical school in London. Evidence of an organization with that name did not appear in Internet searches on Sunday.
Susanna Margolis, a New York-based ghost writer who polished Mr. Rosenblat’s manuscript, said she was surprised by his description of his first blind date with Ms. Radzicki. “I thought that was far-fetched.” she said. “But if somebody comes to you, as an agent and a publisher, and says, ‘This is my story,’ how do you check it other than to say, ‘Did this happen?’ ”
That so many would get taken in by Mr. Rosenblat’s inauthentic love story seems incredible given the number of fake memoirs that have come to light in the last few years. The Holocaust in particular has been fertile territory for fabricated personal histories: earlier this year, Misha Defonseca confessed that her memoir, “Misha: A MĂ©moire of the Holocaust Years,” about her childhood spent running from the Nazis and living with wolves, was not true.
A decade ago, a Swiss historian debunked Binjamin Wilkomirski’s 1996 memoir, “Fragments,” which described how he survived as a Latvian Jewish orphan in a Nazi concentration camp. It turns out the book was written by Bruno Doessekker, a Swiss man who spent the war in relative comfort in Switzerland. Mr. Rosenblat, at least, appears to have told the truth about being a prisoner in the Nazi concentration camps.
The primary sleuth in unmasking his fabrication of the apple story was Kenneth Waltzer, director of Jewish studies at Michigan State University. He has been working on a book on how 904 boys — including the Nobel Peace Prize winner Elie Wiesel — were saved from death by an underground rescue operation inside Buchenwald, and has interviewed hundreds of survivors, including boys from the ghetto at Piotrkow in Poland who were taken with the young Herman Rosenblat to the camp.
When Dr. Waltzer asked other survivors who were with Mr. Rosenblat about the tossed apple story, they said the story couldn’t possibly be true.
In his research of maps drawn by ex-prisoners, Dr. Waltzer learned that the section of Schlieben where Mr. Rosenblat was housed had fences facing other sections of the camp and only one fence — on the south — facing the outside world. That fence was adjacent to the camp’s SS barracks and the SS men there would have been able to spot a boy regularly speaking to a girl on the other side of the fence, Dr. Waltzer said. Moreover, the fence was electrified and civilians outside the camp were forbidden to walk along the road that bordered the fence.
Dr. Waltzer also learned from online documentation that Ms. Radzicki, her parents and two sisters were hidden as Christians at a farm not outside Schlieben but 210 miles away near Breslau.
Holocaust survivors and scholars are fiercely on guard against any fabrication of memories because they taint the truth of the Holocaust and raise doubts about the millions who were killed or brutalized.
“There’s no need to embellish, no need to aggrandize,” said Deborah E. Lipstadt, the Dorot professor of modern Jewish and Holocaust studies at Emory University. “The facts are horrible, and when you’re teaching about horrible stuff you just have to lay out the facts.”
I just got this notice from Amazon.com on January 7, 2009:
Hello from Amazon.com.
We are sorry to report that we will not be able to obtain the following item(s) from your order:
Herman Rosenblat “Angel at the Fence: The True Story of a Love that Survived”
Though we had expected to be able to send this item to you, we’ve since found that it is not available from any of our sources at this time. We realize this is disappointing news to hear, and we apologize for the inconvenience we have caused you.
We have cancelled this item from your order.
Permalink | Comments (20) | Post your comment | Categories: what do you think?
Book Nook provides readers with insights into the world of books. Vick Mickunas takes you into the center of the publishing world with the latest book buzz, book reviews, and exclusive chats with authors..


Comments
By vick
January 13, 2009 12:04 AM | Link to this
But York House Press, a publisher in White Plains, said it was in discussions to release the book as a work of fiction called “Flower at the Fence.” In a statement on its Web site, aboutyhp.com, York House said, “We believe Mr. Rosenblat’s motivations were very human, understandable and forgivable.” (NY Times-Jan. 8/2009)By JewsR#1
January 12, 2009 9:36 AM | Link to this
Silly jews. Holacoust shmolocaust!!!By funnyguy!!!jewsr#1
January 12, 2009 9:32 AM | Link to this
Crazy buncha jews!!! Dont you know that was all a scamm!!!!Holacaust shmolocaust!!!By danny bloom
January 4, 2009 8:59 PM | Link to this
JOSSIP REPORTS — Gabe Sherman and The New Republic are getting all the credit for bringing down Oprah’s house, exposing Herman Rosenblat’s supposed memoir Angel at the Fence as a not-entirely-based-in-fact work of semi-fiction. But what about the guy who gave Sherman the story? Now that Sherman has exposed the hoax and officially branded Oprah as a haven for fake memoirists, somebody else is demanding some credit of his own. His name is Dan Bloom (pictured right), he’s an ex-pat freelance journalist living in Taiwan, former newspaper editor, author of five books including My Excellent Adventures Selling Books from a Pushcart in the Night Markets of Taiwan, and he says it took endless begging to get Sherman — or any other reporter — to even look at his hunch that Rosenblat was lying to the world. Sherman broke the story of the farce memoir the day after Christmas, promptly shooting an email blast to the media gaggle in hopes of publicizing his story. It worked. The Associated Press was all over it; all the media sites globbed on; and anyone who ever held ill will toward Oprah was more than happy to point out her latest folly. And then, on Dec. 29, TNR’s blog The Plank posted an explanation of how Sherman (pictured right) broke the story, which sounds more like an editor’s attempt to juice a good scoop than a reporter yearning to explain his process. Wrote the editors: “Based on interviews with top scholars, Sherman concluded that Herman Rosenblat likely fabricated his story of having been saved in a sub-camp of the Buchenwald concentration camp by a girl who threw apples to him over the fence.” Missing from the summation? The crucial contribution Mr. Bloom says he made. If it weren’t for Bloom looking up Sherman’s name (Bloom says he found Sherman from a Slate article questioning the authenticity of Ishmael Beah’s child soldier memoir) and pestering him to talk to certain people who could call bullshit on Rosenblat’s memoir, the story never would’ve materialized, and Oprah wouldn’t have egg on her face.By lmj
December 31, 2008 3:30 PM | Link to this
With Latifah and Alexander it could even be a musical!By vick
December 30, 2008 10:30 AM | Link to this
OK, LMJ….and I have an idea for an actor to play the author of this bogus memoir: Jason Alexander, the guy who played George Costanza on Seinfeld. I think he would do a great job in the role of a bogus memoirist who let a lie a get way too big….By lmj
December 30, 2008 10:03 AM | Link to this
Who would play Oprah? Queen Latifah! Look how well she did on SNL as Gwen Ifill.By vick
December 29, 2008 11:53 PM | Link to this
But who would play Oprah in the movie? Maybe she could do a cameo as somebody else??By lmj
December 29, 2008 11:23 PM | Link to this
Vick, when I said maybe there will be a movie, I meant a movie about Oprah and a publishing house getting fooled. The way Hoax was a movie about Clifford Irving fooling his publisher.By bad drivers
December 29, 2008 10:49 PM | Link to this
Oprah came to channel 22 the biggest news story of the year. wake up americaBy time
December 29, 2008 7:59 PM | Link to this
I remember the same type of absurdity from my youth, Vick. I was astonished that Carlos Castaneda could put out his work as true and the biggest publishers on the planet classified it non fiction and people ate it up. From Wikipedia: “His 12 books have sold more than 8 million copies in 17 languages. The books and Castaneda, who rarely spoke in public about his work, have been controversial for many years….In the The Power and the Allegory, De Mille compared The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui way of Knowledge with Castanada’s library stack requests at the University of California. The stack requests documented that he was sitting in the library when his journal said he was squatting in don Juan’s hut. One of the most memorable discoveries that De Mille made in his examination of the stack requests was that when Castaneda said he was participating in the traditional peyote ceremony — the least fantastic episode of drug use — he was not only sitting in the library, but he was reading someone else’s description of their experience of the peyote ceremony.” Some things never end!By Blowfly
December 29, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this
This all reminds me of Dave Eggers’ great book What is the What? Which was offered as fiction, but in reality is pretty much the true story of the life of Lost Boy Achak Deng. Even thought it’s true, both Eggers and Deng could not be sure if all the stories were absolutely true since Deng was so young at the time. They decided publish it as fiction just to be safe. This was before James Fey. When you have a great story, fact or fiction, don’t ruin it with a lie. By that way if you are looking for an amazing story of survival this has to be it. It’s hard to read in parts but well worth it in the endBy vick
December 29, 2008 2:51 PM | Link to this
LMJ, if you scroll through the entire article you’ll see that this “memoir” has already been optioned to Hollywood and the movie is still being made: “Harris Salomon, who is producing a movie based on the story, said he would go ahead with the film, but as a work of fiction, adding that Mr. Rosenblat had agreed to donate all earnings from the film to Holocaust survivor charities.”By lmj
December 29, 2008 2:35 PM | Link to this
If it made such a good story as truth, wouldn’t make a good story as fiction? Why couldn’t Rosenblat sold it as fiction rather than risk being caught? And yes, Oprah was caught, but wouldn’t the first blame be on the publisher or editor who accepted the book? I don’t watch Oprah, so I never saw the man on her show or know how she found out about their story. Did the publisher tip her staff? The blame belongs on Rosenblat. Maybe there’ll be a movie - Hoax was a good one about Clifford Irving’s book on Howard Hughes.By Bob
December 29, 2008 1:41 PM | Link to this
Sheople Can you tell me what Obama has to do with this? Just suck it up and wish the country well….you lostBy irishguy
December 29, 2008 1:39 PM | Link to this
When I first heard about this story, I wondered if it was possible. I’m a WWII buff and have read a quite a bit about the holocust. It just didn’t seem likely a girl could get close enough to a camp to deliver apples. They were pretty well guarded and a lot of camps were fairly remote. It was such a good story everyone wanted it to be true.By vick
December 29, 2008 10:39 AM | Link to this
Amazon sent me this confirmation e-mail: (Delivery estimate: February 5, 2009….. 1 “Angel at the Fence: The True Story of a Love that Survived” Herman Rosenblat; Hardcover; $16.29… Sold by: Amazon.com, LLC…) Since the “availability of this title is now in doubt I wonder if they plan to amend their delivery estimate?By vick
December 29, 2008 10:23 AM | Link to this
Last night when I ordered a copy of ANGEL AT THE FENCE from Amazon.com they said that the book would be available on Feb. 3, 2009. They accepted my order and I have not heard otherwise. I just checked the listing for the book on Amazon and now it has this notice: ” Sign up to be notified when this item becomes available.” Perhaps they are hoping another publisher will sign on to publish this bogus memoir?By sheople
December 29, 2008 2:35 AM | Link to this
Oprah got duped a few times after all she was obamas richest supporter lol.By vick
December 28, 2008 11:23 PM | Link to this
I just ordered a copy from Amazon.com…we’ll see if I get it…