Laura Dempsey keeps you up-to-date on all their antics.
Get your own free photo page and see photos from other Dayton-area residents. ohsnap.daytondailynews.com.
Are you a UD sports fan? Whether you like basketball, volleyball, soccer, men's or women's teams — Doesn't matter — this site is for you. udpride.com.
ThinkTV provides a wide variety of programming that informs, inspires and delights audiences of all ages. thinktv.org.
Show everyone how much you love your pet — or how they're driving you nuts. 937pets.com.
Exchange ideas for managing kids, homelife, relationships and work. 937moms.com.
Use the Local Directory to find and review local Dayton businesses. Get the address and contact information for the business you're looking for, and read what other users have to say. daytondailynews.kudzu.com.
SPECIAL REPORT LETHAL PROTECTION
By Mike Wagner, Russell Carollo
Staff Writer
WEST CHESTER TWP., Butler County | The charred pile of twisted metal outside the military Humvee manufacturing plant north of Cincinnati once carried five American soldiers through the mountains of Afghanistan.
An exploding land mine lifted the 10,000-pound armored Humvee off the ground, ripped a chunk of metal off of the frame and caved in half of its front end.
But the soldiers inside walked away, and that's why the wreckage sits on the grounds of the Ohio company that puts armor between America's enemies and America's soldiers.
"The armor on that Humvee performed just as we would have hoped," said George Stringer, a vice president of Armor Holdings Aerospace and Defense Group, the company that owns the plant. "It's very important for our workers to see Humvees that have been hit by a bomb or explosives and know that the armor has saved the lives of our soldiers."
The armor has unquestionably saved lives, as evidenced by the plant's prominent display of testimonials from soldiers who survived attacks in their up-armored Humvees. But the Humvee, which was never designed for battle, is vulnerable to another type of danger. The up-armoring, which adds as much as 3,000 pounds to each vehicle, makes the Humvee more difficult to control and more likely to roll over, particularly when driven at high speeds at night on poor roads — conditions routinely encountered in Iraq. The Army has even instituted rollover drills to train soldiers on escaping from harm when the Humvee begins to tip.
"The Humvee, as a vehicle, wasn't originally designed to carry all the extra weight," said U.S. Rep. David Hobson, R-Springfield, a member of the House Defense Appropriations subcommittee who has been to Iraq four times. "This is not a bad piece of equipment, but it has to be used in the right manner. You have a vehicle and you have to understand how it should be handled.
"Frankly, I don't know how stable a vehicle this is even without armor."
Michael Fox, spokesman for Armor Holdings, said the company works closely with the Army on improvements to the vehicle design.
"We are constantly enhancing and improving these products based on real world performance and input from the users to increase the level of protection and safety they provide and to respond to changes in the environments in which they operate," he said.
Stringer said the Army tests the vehicles at its research laboratory in Maryland before they are put in the field.
"We armor them, develop a solution for the vehicle and they evaluate it there at the testing center," he said.
Armoring cars since the Truman era
The previous owner of the Butler County plant, O'Gara-Hess & Eisenhardt, began armoring government vehicles in 1948; it built President Truman's armored car. The company also produces armored sport utility vehicles for federal agencies, heads of state and others who can afford them.
Production has boomed with the demand for military Humvees. The company, which was purchased by the Jacksonville, Fla.-based Armor Holdings Inc. for $53 million in 2001, moved its commercial production down the street because of the influx in military orders.
The military version of the Humvee isn't cheap. Each vehicle costs about $165,000, with the armor alone at $53,000, according to company officials.
The first factory-armored Humvees — the M1114 — rolled off the assembly line in 1998, but the numbers were small — only 159 a year.
"There was never any expectation that it would be any different," Fox said.
Now the factory's 700 workers churn out about 650 vehicles per month, as the Army replaces its older Humvees and some of the ones that were fortified in the field with steel kits. The M1114, currently the workhorse of the Humvee fleet, is slowly being replaced by a new model that has removable armor.
Only 235 of the 8,000 Humvees deployed to Iraq at the beginning of the war were factory-armored, according to government reports. The rest were either unarmored, armored with steel kits or altered with what soldiers call "hillbilly" armor: Soldiers resorting to weld whatever metal they could get their hands on for protection against roadside bombs and artillery shells.
"It makes our guys feel great when they see or hear that we have had a role in saving lives," said Ron Carson, the company's plant manager. "They are a lot of guys in here that have served in the military. Guys who have been overseas and come back. There is no greater pride for them than to know they are helping fellow soldiers."
How Humvees shed their soft skin
The green soft-skinned Humvees that arrive nearly every day from the AM General factory in Mishawaka, Ind., have no doors, no windows and no roofs.
After nearly two days and 41 stops along an assembly line at the O'Gara plant, each vehicle is fully up-armored and ready for testing.
The doors alone weigh as much as an NFL running back, even before the glass is added.
The glass — after it is cut, shaped, molded and layered — is thick enough to stop a bullet.
The gunner's box, which is mounted on top and surrounded by a steel shield, allows for a turret and a variety of automatic weapons.
Workers in the plant's fabrication shop process 55 tons of steel each day — enough steel to build an old-fashioned locomotive.
In many respects, the brown and beige metal building looks like a typical manufacturing facility, except typical manufacturing facilities don't have an in-house firing range.
Before a single piece of steel is attached to any of the Humvees, testers fire on it with the same weapons often used against American forces in Iraq.
"We want to simulate the exact hits that the Humvee could take in (combat)," Stringer said. "We will even test the steel beyond its breaking point to see how much more it can take. We are always looking for ways to make the armored protection better."
The finished armor forms a metal box covering all sides of the vehicle and attached at the wheel wells and underside of the cab. Heavy-duty locks are installed to ensure that explosions don't send the doors flying open. A steel "underbelly" sheet is fitted all the way underneath the driver side, passenger side and the entire back of the Humvee.
"Basically what we do is we protect the crew (soldiers) — front, top, side, rear, bottom," Carson said. "There are layers of protection from all sides. The idea is to protect the people, not the vehicle."
Once the Humvees are fully armored, inspectors take them out for a 10-mile "test run" — a run Armor Holdings' officials declined to describe.
"We make sure they are ready, let's put it that way," Carson said.
The Humvees armored in Ohio are on the ground in Iraq within 30 to 50 days after leaving the factory floor.
Lighter, safer Humvee could be born in the Miami Valley
In Springfield, just an hour's drive from Armor Holdings' plant in West Chester Twp., plans are underway to develop a lighter-weight Humvee that, in theory, would offer soldiers protection from the enemy while reducing the chance of rollover accidents.
But Hobson, who has worked with a Rhode Island-based company that hopes to build a plant in Springfield, admits he is frustrated by the slowness in the Army's procurement process.
Asked if he expects a new lightweight Humvee to be put into operation anytime soon, Hobson said, "No."
TPI Inc., a company headquartered just outside Providence, R.I., was awarded a $4.5 million contract from the Army last year to begin development and design on three prototypes that it expects to unveil early next year.
John Ragan, director of military business for TPI, said the Springfield plant would employ 75 workers initially and as many as 175 within three to five years.
The company wouldn't disclose the location of the proposed manufacturing facility, but Hobson said it would be next to the Springfield-Beckley Municipal airport south of the city.
Ragan said the company will have a Springfield presence even if it doesn't get the Army contract to build a lighter-weight Humvee because it plans to make other military equipment, parts and vehicles there.
"The reduction in weight will be significant compared to the Humvee that is currently out there," said Ragan, declining to give a "weight goal" for the prototype now being designed at an Army research facility in Michigan. "The goal is to provide as lightweight a vehicle as possible but still provide the same protection it does now."
Ragan said Armor Holdings should not be held responsible for rollover accidents involving the Humvees that are armored there.
"(Armor Holdings) is simply putting the armor on after the fact, to protect our personnel in the military," he said. "Those vehicles were never originally designed to do these missions the way they are armoring them today."
Copyright © 2008 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.
By using DaytonDailyNews.com, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.
Comments
By leonard wahl
June 14, 2006 01:42 PM | Link to this
Russell, Mr. Leonard wahl just read the article. to update you The wife of SSgt Marvin Sprayberry has a new investigation started. Or at least her Congressmen was request one be done! Nadja, lives in Milton, Florida. Recently, moved here from Germany. I like to talk with you briefly. 281-719-0141.
By James
June 13, 2006 09:09 AM | Link to this
I agree that the M1114 Humvee is top heavy due to the additional armor. The additional armor has also greatly reduced deaths and injuries to our soldiers from roadside bombs. A soldier in my Army Reserve unit in Afghanistan was slightly injuried after hitting a roadside bomb in a M1114 Humvee. If he would have been in an unarmored Humvee he would have died. Unfortunately people die and get injuried in war in accidents and combat. The articles blame the Army for the accidents which is inaccurate
By Patric
June 13, 2006 08:05 AM | Link to this
Renee - The bias is that the tone and tenor of the article place the blame for this on the Army, implying that they aren’t being honest/caring about the troops. Go back 18 months and the stories are about how the Army isn’t being open and caring and providing armor. Only one mention in 8 pages of writing about the media’s unceasing call for armor when that was all you heard on the news for months? Come on.
By Anthony
June 12, 2006 06:37 PM | Link to this
Having driven the “unimproved” Army issue vehicle, I can say that those are bad enough with regard to control, acceleration and overall handling. By putting the additional weight on it, it is a wonder they all are not flipping over, falling through substandard roadways, and having braking issues.
These vehicles are great for transporting, but not designed for evasive type driving. By putting the extra weight on, the entire vehicle design is compromised.
By Brian Hart
June 11, 2006 10:54 PM | Link to this
By 2005 no vehicle was allowed out the gate that didn’t have armor which means miles driven skyrocketed for armored humvees skewing results. Drivers have to speed and evade. There is a notable surge in traffic deaths when rotations occur. Improved stateside training with top heavy vehicles would help. The army is addressing this slowly. Excessive wear and maintenance are also contributing factors.
By Brian Hart
June 11, 2006 10:45 PM | Link to this
The author fails to note that there were only a few hundred armored humvees until 1Q04 in Iraq and none in Afghanistan. Now there are over 12000 M1114s in Iraq and 25,000+ Level II applique armored humvees. This means that the stats on an increase in deaths from accidents is inevitably going to rise in correlation v. being caused by the armor.
Mr. Badenoch’s comment about accidental death numbers v. combat is just inaccurate
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 06:59 PM | Link to this
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2006/20060425_4929.html Nearly 1,000 soldiers have already received training on the HEAT, and … the goal is to ensure every Humvee crew transiting through Kuwait gets the training before moving forward to Iraq or another forward location. In the event of a rollover, the training teaches troops how to brace themselves and hold on as they roll, then how to safely get out of the vehicle and ensure all their fellow crewmembers make it safely out too.
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Apr2006/20060425_4929.html Intent on cutting Soldier injuries, Coalition Forces Land Component Command, gcreated the HEAT simulator. It’s a scrapped HUMVEE cab mounted to an elevated M-1 tank engine maintenance stand on the back of M-870A1 trailer — so it could be transported to troop bases. The whole project cost just $10,000 apiece, and CFLCC now has three models with plans to add a fourth to its inventory soon.
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 06:35 PM | Link to this
The Army safety-booklet link is: https://crc.army.mil/guidance/gta/M1114CombinedSafety_Card.pdf
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 06:33 PM | Link to this
Reference Renee’s comments: the Army’s M1114 armored HMMWV received extensive testing and equipment modifications. Please the 27-page Army safety booklet at: https://crc.army.mil/guidance/gta/M1114CombinedSafety_Card.pdf. It describes the Automatic Fire Extinguisher System, the single-movement combat locks, the improved personal-restraint system, the improved gunner’s restraint, roll-over drills and other emergency procedures.
By Renee (U.S. Army honorable discharge 1984)
June 11, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this
The statistics and the facts speak for themselves. Armoured Humvees were sent to troops without proper modifications to accomodate the extensive additional weight of the armor. What bias? This is story about the armored Humvee, sent to battle without necessary testing, modifications, or training - period.
By Patric
June 11, 2006 11:24 AM | Link to this
Your bias is showing. No where in your article do you mention the unrelenting drumbeat of the press about Rummy sending our troops to battle without enough armor. But that would have made for a balanced article. Can’t have that. Would also require you to admit the press doesn’t always know everything. Why not run a report on GM’s dangerous SUVs that roll-over. GM’s FAQ blames most rollovers on driver error, too.
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 11:19 AM | Link to this
The Army Combat Readiness Center developed the Army Safe Driver Training Program, where Soldiers train on various evasive driving tactics in combat conditions. Since 9/11 there has been no increase HMMWV accident rate, even with increased operational tempo and increased use of vehicles.
By jerry
June 11, 2006 10:55 AM | Link to this
The army publishes monthly stats on accidents, roadside IED’s and fatalities. It would have been nice if in your extensive research you could have looked into how many lives have been saved with the up armored hummers. I drove a M998 for most of my 8 years in the army and found it to be an awesome offroad vehicle. As for blaming the Somalia debacle on the hummer you forgot to mention that the task force involved requested armored vehicles and was denied by, I believe, Les Aspin.
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 09:50 AM | Link to this
The Army and General Motors Corporation partnered to train Soldiers’ (in combat zones) how to better negotiate skidding conditions, thus reducing rollovers accidents and avoiding serious injuries.
By John Boyce, U.S. Army
June 11, 2006 09:47 AM | Link to this
While the armored HMMWV is inherently a stable vehicle, increased mission payload, evolving threats in theater and armor protection place added demands on the vehicle. As we increased fielding of the vehicles, the rate of HMMWV rollover accidents also rose — nearly reaching the United States’ domestic driving rollover rate of three percent (NHTSA 2002).
By
June 11, 2006 09:44 AM | Link to this
Since 2004, the U.S. Army aggressively launched a series of multi-discipline efforts to reduce rollovers that focused on enhancing crew and operator safety and accident reduction while vehicles were operated in combat operations. While we are an Army at war, we will continue improving our training, tactics, and war-fighting capabilities to match the needs of combat. And, we remain committed to the priority effort of force protection and safety for our Soldiers on the battlefield.
By douglas
June 11, 2006 09:18 AM | Link to this
what a waste of human life! I can’t understand why we are still over there . Either raise an american flag overthere and take their oil or get the hell out and leave them alone