View All

Top Jobs

Latest featured videos from DaytonDailyNews.com

Latest nation / world video from AP

By Jessica Wehrman

Staff Writer

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

WASHINGTON — Sen. Barack Obama may not participate in a planned Feb. 27 debate in Ohio, saying he'd prefer to spend the time up to Ohio's March 4 primary talking to voters, not to Sen. Hillary Clinton.

"Sen. Obama has debated Sen. Clinton 18 times during this campaign — including four times in the last month," said Ben LaBolt, an Obama spokesman. "There will be more debates before this race is over. Right now, Sen. Obama will focus his time in Ohio on meeting with and listening to the concerns of voters rather than talking again to Sen. Clinton."

Extras

The campaign left open the possibility that Obama might later change his mind.

Earlier in the day, Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson reiterated Clinton's desire to hold a debate a week between Tuesday's Super Tuesday primary and March 4, the day that delegate-rich states Ohio and Texas are set to vote. Wolfson credited part of Clinton's success on Super Tuesday to her performance in debates leading up to the election.

Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman, an Obama supporter, said he did not think Obama's decision would impact his performance in the state.

"What Ohio wants is Barack to be here and he can be here and see the people of the state, people in Columbus, Dayton, Cleveland and Cincinnati, without being in a debate," Coleman said. "He's had debates."

If the Republican contest is still going, CNN is planning a GOP debate in Ohio on Feb. 28.

> Do you think the candidates should debate again?

Comments

By Rob Cincy

February 27, 2008 2:29 PM | Link to this

Again let me be the voice of reason. Ok for one you are not going to sway a hillary supporter and vice versa. This leaves the fence straddlers. Anyone that I see on here posting has already made up their mind. Frankly I would not want but a few of you as supporters anyways due to the fact that you’re all sheep. Lets get down to real business. How will we sway the people who have not decided and that leaves out a majority of us. Thus it is not news. Yes the media has done a poor job.

By mommygenius

February 27, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this

Let us review our history. John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr and Abraham Lincoln were great Speakers. They gave speeches we still teach our children as examples of what we stand for, of what this country is about. Since when is being a great Speaker something to be wary about in politics? Isnt being a bad Speaker what has broken many a candidates before?

By mommygenius

February 27, 2008 10:40 AM | Link to this

See, this is the problem we are facing today. It doesnt matter who is holding him high, who is he holding high. Even the devil knows when a man in a good man. Just because the devil says it doesnt mean he isnt. Use common sense.

By jodee

February 27, 2008 6:50 AM | Link to this

Obama has a great way of speaking to the people, with his good looks and his knowlwdge of what to say and when to say it. Especially who to say it to. I do not know if he is MUSLIM or not, but I DO know that FARRAKHAN is on his side and saying the whole world would be better off with him in the Presidency. Educate yourself on the ones that are holding him high.Just because he is a good “showman” does not mean he will be a good Pres. in fact—he deserves an Oscar! VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT OBAMA!

By Qristofir

February 27, 2008 6:27 AM | Link to this

This is a response to dar1031. Stop talking about the debate like it is in the future. It happened last night and he scored big while she embarassed herself once more. He gains momentum after each debate too so get your facts straight. Like Obama himself said, longevity in Washington is not experience and unfortunately, that’s all Clinton got going for her.

By mommygenius

February 27, 2008 1:31 AM | Link to this

dar1031 you say that “Hillary Clinton has a clear plan of action, has the leadership ability needed to carry out and execute and implement changes needed to accomplish the many missions our nation faces”. It is interesting that you should say that because so did Bush. Look where that got us! As far as the debating issue, how many did you need? This is no. 20? Has anything or any of their issues changed drastically for you. Let me see how they interact with the American people.

By blueskyhigh

February 27, 2008 1:28 AM | Link to this

According to polls, Obama wins every time he debates. He is constantly picking up more endorsements. Check this out, and have a good night! http://home.peoplepc.com/psp/newsstory.asp?cat=TopStories&referrer=welcome&id=20080226/47c39cd03ca615526200802261448441081

By dar1031

February 27, 2008 1:13 AM | Link to this

Obama know he will lose votes when he debates. and know that they are statistically very close in the race.so even 1 or 2 hundred votes make a diffference. the more debates the better americans can gain knowledge of the candidates to make a choice now and call the game is foolish. alot can happen between now and november we all need to look closely. and choose the lessor of two evils..

By dar1031

February 27, 2008 1:05 AM | Link to this

Hillary Clinton has a clear plan of action, has the leadership ability needed to carry out and execute and implement changes needed to accomplish the many missions our nation faces..Talk is cheap obama stole words off some inspiration and hope get well cards at the hallmark store.. later he will say his greeting card friend said he could use them cause thier good lines.What substance does he have nobody knows what he is made of he cant answer a question and thatputs americans on hold and ignor

By blueskyhigh

February 27, 2008 1:02 AM | Link to this

Sorry for the double post. It was a glitch.

By blueskyhigh

February 27, 2008 12:59 AM | Link to this

I say “No”, they should not debate so soon in Ohio. Young people, and old alike are being inspired by getting to meet Obama, and thousands are registering to vote, some for the first time. Obama HAS the nation excited.

Frankly, Hillary has ALWAYS turned my stomach. Even from the day she said she was no Tammy Wynette, who’d stand by her man, and stay home and bake cookies all day.

The Clintons have WAY too much baggage to re-enter the White House. We need a fresh,clean start

By blueskyhigh

February 27, 2008 12:57 AM | Link to this

I say “No”, they should not debate so soon in Ohio. Young people, and old alike are being inspired by getting to meet Obama, and thousands are registering to vote, some for the first time. Obama HAS the nation excited.

Frankly, Hillary has ALWAYS turned my stomach. Even from the day she said she was no Tammy Wynette, who’d stand by her man, and stay home and bake cookies all day. (Barf.)

The Clintons have WAY too much baggage to re-enter the White House. We need a fresh,clean start

By mommygenius

February 27, 2008 12:55 AM | Link to this

OK. We have established that he in not Muslim. But isn’t this the same scare tactics the Bush Presidency have been using since 9-11 to keep our husbands, brothers, sons, daughters, mothers, in Iraq? “All Muslims are bad so we need to keep our troops in Iraq”. Mind you, even Saddam denounced (or should I say “rejected”) BinLaden even before the 9-11 tragedy. That is like saying all whites are racist because of the KKK. I know we Americans are not so shallow-minded.

By mommygenius

February 27, 2008 12:24 AM | Link to this

In response to DaddysDarlin. I could care less about anyones religious belief. How Romney, Obama or Clinton praise their God is not my concern. Bill Clinton’s religion didnt stop him from getting a “b-job” while in office. I care about what they are going to do once they get into office and how they would serve the needs of the American people.

By Sadie

February 26, 2008 11:42 PM | Link to this

I was on the fence with which democrate to vote for for a while. I lost all respect for Hillary when she decided that her MI & FL votes should count when the democratic party as a whole said otherwise. This is an example of ‘changing the rules’ to get your way. She came out of her own pocket $5m to fund her campaign & was proud to admit that, when all that shows to me is that she does not have the support of the people.

By Qristofir

February 26, 2008 11:39 PM | Link to this

This comment is to DaddysDarlin and whoever else on this forum is a debate junkie. Well there’s your debate! She performed terribly and pathetically at the best! Confronting the moderators on the sequence of questions, couldn’t draw any more contrasts with Obama and decided to draw one between the words “reject” and “denounce” .. she sucked. Obama had her for lunch. She should concede tonight after that performance. Thank You!

By DaddysDarlin

February 26, 2008 9:57 PM | Link to this

I suggest you check out Obamas church of choice and read the mantras on their website. Very informative. Their allegiance is to Africa, in their mantra, not my words. They also believe that 9/11 is Americas fault, because we stuck our noses where they didn’t belong. Their words not mine. Why did Mit Romney have to answer for his Mormon religion, yet Obama who certainly should answer questions about his, it is no longer an issue? Why not answer for your religious beliefs Obama?

By mommygenius

February 26, 2008 9:55 PM | Link to this

In commenting on a previous comment, I think that Obama is just the right person to face, and defeat, McCain. I think that he has all that it would take to ensure McCain does not get into the White House. Look at it realistically. If it were to choose between McCain and Hilary, two so-called “experienced” both voted in support for the Iraq war, both are “corporate-minded”, what choice is there?

By DaddysDarlin

February 26, 2008 9:47 PM | Link to this

Obama doesn’t want to debate Hillary because she is by far the better debater. He loses votes each time they debate and he knows it. This time in Ohio he will have to defend the mailers that went out with blatantly false information. Obama is trying to scare votes his way by distorting Hillary’s health insurance program and making false statements about how she voted about key issues. If Hillary sticks up for her record shes a b***h, if he does hes simply setting the record straight.

By mommygenius

February 26, 2008 9:42 PM | Link to this

I think Hilary Clinton is banking on her husband record to get her into the White House. And speaking of pressure, every time she feels the pressure of the elections, she cries and whines, and gets petty, and that was most apparent when she renges on her word about Florida and Michigan’s delegates not being counted only after she began loosing. Is that what we should look forward to if she was to be elected? Reneging on her words to the American people because things are not going her way?

By cg news

February 26, 2008 9:29 PM | Link to this

I agree with the one comment… “When Bill Clinton lied, nobody died!” When Bush came into office, how many innocent people have died?? Get real people. The man destroyed our country - in every way possible. And would do more damage if he were allowed to. He’s like a dictator Stop all of the bashing here and grow up. Just go vote for the candidate of your choice, be adult about it, and shut up! I’m sick of seeing this ** on here and on CNN. CNN is wearing me out with the QUICKNESS!

By mommygenius

February 26, 2008 9:26 PM | Link to this

As a female, I dont like the way Hilary Clinton tries to win votes by “crying” every chance she gets. As for the debate, I could care less about hearing another debate. As for experience, even she was inexperienced once. If everyone was to hold our inexperience against us, which of us would progress and become experienced and good at our jobs. And lastly, why is she so big on the American people not having HOPE! Isnt that what makes us look forward to tommorow?

By TMJ4477

February 26, 2008 9:25 PM | Link to this

Why hasn’t anyone asked Hillary how is she going to handle international relations with countries who do not respect women (e.g. Latin America & Middle East). Why isn’t anyone upset by her flippant behavior, with our relations as they are in other countries (believe me they are watching this) do you really want her to represent our country? I am all for equality however her actions highlight the stereotypical cattiness and witchyness of women. Her actions are unpresidential &she has lost my vote

By Omar Flores

February 26, 2008 9:16 PM | Link to this

There should be many debates. The more debates the better in order to find out who this Obama really is. He sounds like an infomercial, and are people buying into another Bush election?

By Obed Arango

February 26, 2008 9:12 PM | Link to this

Senator Obama has copied the “Si SE PUEDE OF THE LATINOS IMMIGRANTS” (I thik he is not to original) I have not seen also senator Obama understanding the reality of us the immigrants and providing real solutions to immigration.

Latinos from Texas should know that with Senator Obama we won’t reach the immigration reform. Hillary is wiser and is landed into earth. Yes Senator Obama can speak with eloquence and can inspire people, but life is much more than inspiration, is about solutions and is about knowing the ground. Hillary knows the ground and knows how to negotiate.

I think in the long run McCain can pass Obama, and we cannot endure four more years of republicans in power. Today Obama is on the top because is a media momentum, remember McCain was down few months ago and can defeat Obama. I believe Hillary has enough experience to face McCain and win. If you want four more years republican in power vote for Obama.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:06 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:05 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:05 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:05 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:04 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By vickie101

February 26, 2008 9:04 PM | Link to this

OK. Now, I am sure I am not the only one here who sees a problem with Hilary Clinton’s tactics. First, she agrees on not counting Florida and Michigan delegates and then shows her true colors by publicly showing that her word is no good by trying to include those delegates only after she won in those states and lost big in the ones following. Then she “cries” every chance she gets to win sympathy. Just what this country needs, a whiny, crying female, in the White House. NO THANKS!

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:04 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:04 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Jeff Stark

February 26, 2008 9:03 PM | Link to this

I beleive there should be more debates , I for one beleive that a true test of A Canidate is to see how they work under presure.. I also beleive that the Media should not be able to Spin the Canidates words and possibly manipulate the Election.. I am totally upset at the media, they dont show the facts they manipulate the facts for whomever they want to win…You can see it in everything they say.. thats all I have to say.

By Sean

February 26, 2008 8:45 PM | Link to this

Debate again? So Hillary can do her best to try and shake things up with her bogus accusations? These debates have become repetitive and pointless. Hillary simply seeks a debate because her campaign has run out of money and a debate is the cheapest, fastest way for her to try and derail Obamas bid. This would be a fine cause if she had a real reason to pull voters away from his corner. The problem is, you can’t attack something thats good for the people. It will only hurt her in the end.

By Will

February 26, 2008 8:33 PM | Link to this

Both Hillary and Obama are shameful excuses for progressive politicians. Neither candidate addresses the most pressing question for our nation: our bloated military budget, which continues to consume over 50% of our discretionary funds. If we redistributed a fraction of our tax money to science, education, and healthcare, we’d be on our way to a civil society. We definitely need genuine debates. Hillary and Barack should debate true progressives, like Ralph Nader, but they’re too scared.

By Marietta

February 26, 2008 8:28 PM | Link to this

Give it up Hilary. It becomes more clear by the day that you represent more of the same old crap that’s been in Washington for years. Go home, make Bill some cookies, and take up a craft. I am a woman and have always voted Republican - this year I am for Barack! GO OBAMA!

By Jesus

February 26, 2008 8:01 PM | Link to this

wow… anyone who is saying Obama is a muslim is completely ignorant and misinformed… there are no two ways about it… shame on you

By Keith Rhoades

February 26, 2008 7:53 PM | Link to this

it’s sad…I was so hopeful that the democrats would recapture the white house and all I’ve seen is bitterness and devisiveness within the party over Obama and Clinton…downright mean rude comments on both sides. If that’s the type of people that are now in this party..I’ll cast my vote for McCain.

By Jausan

February 26, 2008 7:50 PM | Link to this

No because if she could not get it right in 18 tries, then there is a problem with Hillary. There is no need for her to try to get serious now, too late, she should have done this in eachs tate that Barrack Obama won in instead trying to be this lofty candidate that thought only New York, California, Texas and Florida mattered. Let’s get real, it is over Hillary, just face it this is one election you will lose.

By Obamafan

February 26, 2008 7:45 PM | Link to this

No Obama shouldn’t waste his time debating Hillary. She’ll try to use her crying as a sympathy vote again. As a christian I was offended by her remarks mocking Barack using “hope”, she stated something like, “the sky will open and the light will shine down and the choir will be singing and the world will be perfect”. Then, next thing you know she has a commercial regarding her “faith” and her being blessed??? Hypocrite or what?? She is not sincere or “real” like Obama! Go Obama all the way!!!

By Ash

February 26, 2008 7:39 PM | Link to this

Actually, if I were Hillary I would not have exploded as she did about the mailer. I would have waited until the Ohio debate. And now when Obama after distributing a mailer like this has decided to back out from the debate…now Hillary would have the chance to explode as she did before. By the way this completely shows Barrack Obama’s nature of instigating something and then backing down without giving any explanation. I feel actually sorry for Obama’s supporters!!!

By Cam

February 26, 2008 5:06 PM | Link to this

I personally have looked into both of the canidates very thoroughly. I found that Obama does indeed have connections to a Chicago slum lord. I also found that Hillary disapproved of her husbands plans for NAFTA. It seems Obama has been handing out flyers in Ohio saying that Hillary supported NAFTA. Obama has said countless times, that he doesn’t want to mudsling with Hillary, but it’s a total contradiction. He is mudslinging. They should debate.

By EB

February 26, 2008 4:22 PM | Link to this

Before Senator Obama has another debate with Hilary, he needs to check her monthly calendar. It could turn out drastic!

By Columbus, Ohio

February 26, 2008 3:04 PM | Link to this

Debating is now useless for Obama and Clinton. The last debate didn’t change anything. They just sat there and talked about how similar their views are. Well, if they’re similar then there is no need to debate.

By LMV

February 26, 2008 2:54 PM | Link to this

Janie- Obama has recieved no corporate contributions. All his donations are from indivdual donors. Unlike your candidate who has gone on record stating that she is ok excepting contributions from corporations and lobbyists. Please check your facts. Attacks have been consistently launched against Obama buy HC’s campaign…from the very beginning. Maybe you don’t recall her being booed at the last debate.

At least educate yourself. There is a big difference between facts & propaganda

By David K

February 26, 2008 2:41 PM | Link to this

TALK OF EXPERIENCE: DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ, COLIN POWELL, DICK CHENEY! NO EXPERIENCE CAN EXCEED THIS TEAMS’ EXPERIENCE, AND WHAT KIND OF AMERICA DID WE GET?. ENOUGH OF EXPERIENCE WHICH TURNS OUT TO BE USELESS!

By David K

February 26, 2008 2:40 PM | Link to this

TALK OF EXPERIENCE: DONALD RUMSFELD, PAUL WOLFOWITZ, COLIN POWELL, DICK CHENEY! NO EXPERIENCE CAN EXCEED THIS TEAMS’ EXPERIENCE, AND WHAT KIND OF AMERICA DID WE GET?. ENOUGH OF EXPERIENCE WHICH TURNS OUT TO BE USELESS!

By Justin

February 26, 2008 10:29 AM | Link to this

Geez, most of you…both Clinton and Obama supporters…are insane. I’m an Obama supporter, but both sides really need to calm down. Either of these candidates would be a major improvement over our current leader.

By Madelyn, Ohio

February 26, 2008 10:00 AM | Link to this

They better debate. He is scared because he knows he is inexperienced and now he’s becoming vetted the way he SHOULD have been all along

By JUNIOR

February 26, 2008 7:48 AM | Link to this

LOTS OF LIES!ARE AMERICANS SO STUPID?I AM A GERMAN,EUROPEAN AND I HAVE TO SAY THAT IT IS SAD SEE HOW URGLY THE U.S DEMOCRACY LOOKS LIKE!FULL OF FALSEHOOD,RACISM even WHEN A CANDIDATE IS SMART&PARTLY BORN WHITE?IT IS A DIRTY DEMOCRATICAL PROCESS!HOW THEN SHOULD AMERICA POINT FINGERS AT OTHER COUNTRIES ON DEMOCRACY WHEN THE U.S HASN´T GOT THE MORAL BASE!I THINK WE AS PART OF THE REST OF THE WORLD WILL LIKE TO SEE A PRESIDENT OBAMA FOR HIS POSITIVE VISIONS AND JUDGEMENT ABILITY,WE´RE WELL CONVINCED

By Kathy in Beavercreek

February 26, 2008 5:35 AM | Link to this

They’ve debated 18 times already! I want BOTH candidates to get out & talk to the people & spend less time talking about the same subjects over & over again in a debate. Both candidates have something good to offer this country and, ultimately, one of them will come out of this as the Democratic nominee. So, let’s stop bashing the candidates & each other. Everyone has a right to their opinion, so don’t be hateful to those who don’t share yours. Let’s come together, America!

By Qristofir

February 26, 2008 2:08 AM | Link to this

“Talk is cheap” she says. Well if this talk seems to unite a good chunk of America (which is evident) then I guess talk is what we need because this country is falling apart into too many distinct divisions. Now here is homework for all those who jump on the “he has no detailed plan” bandwagon: Name some key topics Hilary has brought home in detail that he hasn’t. Do your own research before you believe anything either candidates say, afterall it is your vote….. USE YOUR GOD-GIVEN BRAINS !!!

By Qristofir

February 26, 2008 1:21 AM | Link to this

All Clinton has going for her is her popularity and fame and she just can’t stand seeing this “freshman senator” steal that shine. It hurts I know but she needs to snap out of it. What experience does she really have? And if you have watched the debates, she is not any more detailed than Obama is on the issues. She makes one false contrast and you guys run away with it like battery-operated dummies. Use your brains (if you’ve got one) and stop echoing everything you hear her say.

By andrew

February 25, 2008 11:48 PM | Link to this

It seems Obama has no real plan or leadership for all Americans. It appears that he lacks accountabilty because no one dare say a word about anything he has done without being ridaculed and chastised. What concerns me and should concern all Americans is the creed and oath that his church states where all black families should come first. But worst than that he has been all but endorsed by Farakann. AMERICA BEWARE. Where does he stand on Isreal considering his muslim roots?

By Joel

February 25, 2008 11:07 PM | Link to this

Cant wait until OBAMA becomes our nominee. Silly season to be over soon!

By Janie

February 25, 2008 11:01 PM | Link to this

That is a big no on the Democratic party views. He has divided the party period. The NY times or whatever paper it was that said “Hillary calls NAFTA a BOON to the economy” printed a retraction and said that those were not Hillary’s words but their own. HOW THEY PERCEIVED WHAT SHE SAID. Yet, Obama insists on bashing Hillary for the original statement the newspaper made. When she saw those fliers she at least thought that Obama was printing an apology. That is what got her so mad.

By Janie

February 25, 2008 11:01 PM | Link to this

That is a big no on the Democratic party views. He has divided the party period. The NY times or whatever paper it was that said “Hillary calls NAFTA a BOON to the economy” printed a retraction and said that those were not Hillary’s words but their own. HOW THEY PERCEIVED WHAT SHE SAID. Yet, Obama insists on bashing Hillary for the original statement the newspaper made. When she saw those fliers she at least thought that Obama was printing an apology. That is what got her so mad.

By Janie

February 25, 2008 10:58 PM | Link to this

Also should he decide not to debate, it is a big mistake on his part. About his campaign funds, anyone ever wonder where they are coming from? Big corporations that employ Lobbyists. He told John Kerry that he against swiftboating and wanted to end it and unite the party. That is how he got Kerry’s endorsement. Remember how Kerry was swiftboated in the 2000 election, how it effected the outcome? Obama has switched his moods and swiftboated Hillary.

By Janie

February 25, 2008 10:49 PM | Link to this

Obama is running scared. He is trying to hide something. Why else would he decide not to debate. Hillary is calling his bluff and he is scared. Those pictures sent out of him being in a Turban are just too coincidental to be from the Hillary camp. He is the one making a fuss about. Makes you wonder what he has to hide. The man can talk a good talk, but he cannot debate.

By Jerry Odom

February 25, 2008 8:37 PM | Link to this

It is time to wake up, America, and remove the political blinders that you mistakenly believe drive you to vote strictly for your party. Your party no longer exists for your benefit. The Parties exist solely for the survival and advancement of their organizations and their hold on control of our government. A vote for either major party presidential candidate is a vote for continuing that stranglehold on each and every one of us. It’s time to say, “Enough!” It’s time to vote for an independent

By ObamaFan

February 25, 2008 5:18 PM | Link to this

Wouldn’t we rather talk to Obama one-on-one, instead of watching a debate where Clinton doesn’t even answer half of the questions she is asked?

By ObamaFan

February 25, 2008 5:17 PM | Link to this

Wouldn’t we rather talk to Obama one-on-one, instead of watching a debate where Clinton doesn’t even answer half of the questions she is asked?

By Jim

February 25, 2008 5:11 PM | Link to this

Why must they debate again?? For those of you that are saying Obama does not want to debate because ‘his true self’ will come out, you are idiots! They debated 18 times, this debate would be like all of the rest. Obama won the majority of the debates as he is a TRUE LEADER. He is not Muslim, he is not without substance (that is a Hillary lie), his health care would be beneficial to more Americans than Clinton’s plan (and cost less). Clinton wants free air time.

By klo

February 25, 2008 5:01 PM | Link to this

Despite which candidate you support, why wouldn’t you want another debate? The debates are the most comprehensive way to explore and challenge the candidate’s platforms, and enables voters to make an educated decision. If Obama declines participation in the debate, than it sets the precedence that he is going to “duck and cover” when anything daunting comes if he does eventually become President. Clearly the only thing Obama wants to take a stand on is his soap box!

By klo

February 25, 2008 5:01 PM | Link to this

Despite which candidate you support, why wouldn’t you want another debate? The debates are the most comprehensive way to explore and challenge the candidate’s platforms, and enables voters to make an educated decision. If Obama declines participation in the debate, than it sets the precedence that he is going to “duck and cover” when anything daunting comes if he does eventually become President. Clearly the only thing Obama wants to take a stand on is his soap box!

By karen

February 25, 2008 3:53 PM | Link to this

For those of you who have bought Hillary’s line about her “experience’, I’d urge you to go to www.thomas.loc.gov (Library of Congress) and see what she’s REALLY done. She’s named some post offices, that’s for sure . Barack Obama has an impressive, substantive record of authoring and co-authoring some important legislation that will have a positive impact on our lives. I’m sick of hearing about her “record” - compare their records yourself.

By Marsha

February 25, 2008 10:16 AM | Link to this

A decision to not debate Clinton his week would be very wise. The Clinton campaign is desperate to win the nomination - after this weekend’s Clinton performance to a factual mailer (I know the facts hurt sometime), it’s obvious the Clinton tactics will go nasty. I found it interesting that the Clinton tactics have been less than honorable at times thoughout the entire campaign and tolerated well by the Obama camp. They have thoroughly debated all issues with the voters expressing their choice.

By Ghost of JFK

February 25, 2008 9:45 AM | Link to this

I would love to ask all candidates the following three questions and listen to their answers.

(1) An Iranain gun boat slams into a US Navy Ship in the Straits of Hormoz near Dubai, causing deaths, jamming the oil shipping lanes. Violence escallates, the military pushes hard to retaliate because they say further attacks are planned on US military interests and oil facilities. You need to authorize an immediate invasion to prevent and punish Iran. What would you do and why?

By Annie

February 25, 2008 8:09 AM | Link to this

I have to agree that this looks like Obama is avoiding the fact that he is a whole lot of flash and no substance. Being an Army family, I have questions about what type of Commander in Chief he will be, I don’t believe that he respects the military or their values. I realldy do question his pride in the US after hearing all the negative comments from the important people who surround him Ie his wife and pastor. I don’t believe that he is the answer. Frankly, I don’t believe any them are.

By paul

February 25, 2008 6:59 AM | Link to this

Obama is just afraid that people will get beyond the hype and see that he is not the most experienced and prepared candidate. I can’t see him not being involved in the debate, for me that would be a bad sign. However, supporters who cannot name any of his accomplishments or his plans will support him. If he gets elected, they will be the first ones to cry foul or cry racism….what ever happened to sexism, Is Racism worse?

By kurt

February 25, 2008 2:55 AM | Link to this

Yes they should have this debate. This one will be very interesting. I think we will see Clintons experience come full Throttle. He(Obama) seems like a little kid compared to her anyway…All i hear from obama is we can, we can.. What? What is your plan? Spell it out. I don’t want to hear, “I’m the best candidate, or I’m best suited for this or that. He never seems to be pro or anti anything. Vote with your brain and not your heart and i believe you will come up with Hillary Rodham Clinton.

By Jasmine

February 24, 2008 7:25 PM | Link to this

Good Job Obama!! don’t waste your time playing children games with clinton. She has not made her point out of a thousand debates yet, then its never going to be made. She just want to cry about some flyer’s of TRUTH!! I REPEAT TRUTH!! do your homework before you start backlashing. Go Obama! you will be president ‘08.

P.S: Great Job at the last debate!

By Justin

February 24, 2008 5:16 PM | Link to this

Obama doesnt want to debate because it makes him look as unprepared as he really is!! We all remember seeing his face after clinton closed the night with great remarks!! His lips said ….She was good…..She did it…..watch closely not hard to see. Also he couldnt wait to get up he was upset with how well she did. He already agreed to the debate dont back out unless you cant handle the heat!!!!

By Qristofir

February 24, 2008 2:04 PM | Link to this

All you bubbleheads crying about a 19th and 20th debate, he has debated her 18 damn times. How many more does she need to make her point? They debated on thursday. Now what has significantly changed in one week that she feels this insatiable desire to debate about? The woman is a freak show! She switches like a damn chameleon. The latest now is her little rage about 2 fliers his campaign puplished. Somebody please tell that crazy lady that those that live in glass houses dont throw stones!!!

By Jane

February 24, 2008 2:17 AM | Link to this

Will you hate mongers stop spreading lies? If you spent a few minutes researching on the Internet you would know that Barack Obama is NOT MUSLIM. You must believe anything forwarded to your email inbox. Do your own research- question the propaganda your “friends” send to you before you embarrass yourself further. Check Wikipedia, check SNOPES (the urban legend debunker), check any legitimate news source. Chicago Tribune has a long bio on Obama’s early childhood & how his father played no part.

By lia

February 23, 2008 5:15 PM | Link to this

Well lets see,we are all unperfect,both parties have something that people talk about, NOBODY IS PERECT. But i think Hillary we be best in the white house,she has all the expierience to do the job Hey what do we have to lose anway. I am not going to vote for some one that might bring terorists, REMEMBER HE IS MUSLIM .Those people are the ones d no like this country.

By Janet Reno

February 22, 2008 3:12 PM | Link to this

Obama’s efforts to connect to the Republican Party, specifically Bush, and Dick Chaney, of the Halliburton Company, dates back to the Presidents Grandfather, Prescott Bush, and indeed Chaney was once an executive officer of Halliburton.

The American military pounds Iraq with Artillary, bombs, and the like, destroying large sections of cities, and infra-structures, then Halliburton comes in to rebuild. Halliburton and Halliburton associated companies have raked in ten’s of billions.

Obama is just like the BIG HALIBURTAN. Haliburton has contracted to build detention centers in the U.S. similiar to the one in Quantanammo Bay, Cuba. Halliburton does nothing to earn the Two Dollars for each meal an American Serviceman in Iraq eats.

http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/

Halliburton was scheduled to take control of the Dubai Ports in The United Arab Emiirate. The deal was canceled when Bush was unable to affect the transfer of the American Ports.

Now we see what some might suspect as similiar financial escapading from the Democrats.

Two years ago, Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity gave a $50 million contract to a start-up security company - Companion- owned by now-indicted businessman (TONY REZKO) Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop, Daniel T. Frawley, to train Iraqi power-plant guards in the United States. An Iraqi leadership change left the deal in limbo. Now the company, Companion Security, is working to revive its contract. Involved along with Antoin “Tony” Rezco, long time friend and neighbor of Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and former cop Daniel T. Frawley, is Aiham Alsammarae. Alsammarae was accused of financial corruption by Iraqi authorities and jailed in Iraq last year before escaping and returning here.

LIKE FATHER LIKE SON — Obama should be vetted and disclose his connection to the criminal money generating underworld. Besides, his connections to the REZCO MAFIA types, his up-coming tax fraud charges — Obama needs to disclose why he is a MUSLIM and stop suppoting our intervention in IRAQ. It’s time to introduce this fake Xerox - X box Obama and invite the thief plagiarizing pipsqueke to meet the Crooked Creek Police Department.

By Janet Reno

February 22, 2008 3:12 PM | Link to this

Obama’s efforts to connect to the Republican Party, specifically Bush, and Dick Chaney, of the Halliburton Company, dates back to the Presidents Grandfather, Prescott Bush, and indeed Chaney was once an executive officer of Halliburton.

The American military pounds Iraq with Artillary, bombs, and the like, destroying large sections of cities, and infra-structures, then Halliburton comes in to rebuild. Halliburton and Halliburton associated companies have raked in ten’s of billions.

Obama is just like the BIG HALIBURTAN. Haliburton has contracted to build detention centers in the U.S. similiar to the one in Quantanammo Bay, Cuba. Halliburton does nothing to earn the Two Dollars for each meal an American Serviceman in Iraq eats.

http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/

Halliburton was scheduled to take control of the Dubai Ports in The United Arab Emiirate. The deal was canceled when Bush was unable to affect the transfer of the American Ports.

Now we see what some might suspect as similiar financial escapading from the Democrats.

Two years ago, Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity gave a $50 million contract to a start-up security company - Companion- owned by now-indicted businessman (TONY REZKO) Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop, Daniel T. Frawley, to train Iraqi power-plant guards in the United States. An Iraqi leadership change left the deal in limbo. Now the company, Companion Security, is working to revive its contract. Involved along with Antoin “Tony” Rezco, long time friend and neighbor of Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and former cop Daniel T. Frawley, is Aiham Alsammarae. Alsammarae was accused of financial corruption by Iraqi authorities and jailed in Iraq last year before escaping and returning here.

LIKE FATHER LIKE SON — Obama should be vetted and disclose his connection to the criminal money generating underworld. Besides, his connections to the REZCO MAFIA types, his up-coming tax fraud charges — Obama needs to disclose why he is a MUSLIM and stop suppoting our intervention in IRAQ. It’s time to introduce this fake Xerox - X box Obama and invite the thief plagiarizing pipsqueke to meet the Crooked Creek Police Department.

By Janet Reno

February 22, 2008 3:11 PM | Link to this

Obama’s efforts to connect to the Republican Party, specifically Bush, and Dick Chaney, of the Halliburton Company, dates back to the Presidents Grandfather, Prescott Bush, and indeed Chaney was once an executive officer of Halliburton.

The American military pounds Iraq with Artillary, bombs, and the like, destroying large sections of cities, and infra-structures, then Halliburton comes in to rebuild. Halliburton and Halliburton associated companies have raked in ten’s of billions.

Obama is just like the BIG HALIBURTAN. Haliburton has contracted to build detention centers in the U.S. similiar to the one in Quantanammo Bay, Cuba. Halliburton does nothing to earn the Two Dollars for each meal an American Serviceman in Iraq eats.

http://www.halliburtonwatch.org/

Halliburton was scheduled to take control of the Dubai Ports in The United Arab Emiirate. The deal was canceled when Bush was unable to affect the transfer of the American Ports.

Now we see what some might suspect as similiar financial escapading from the Democrats.

Two years ago, Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity gave a $50 million contract to a start-up security company - Companion- owned by now-indicted businessman (TONY REZKO) Tony Rezko and a onetime Chicago cop, Daniel T. Frawley, to train Iraqi power-plant guards in the United States. An Iraqi leadership change left the deal in limbo. Now the company, Companion Security, is working to revive its contract. Involved along with Antoin “Tony” Rezco, long time friend and neighbor of Democratic Presidential hopeful Barack Obama, and former cop Daniel T. Frawley, is Aiham Alsammarae. Alsammarae was accused of financial corruption by Iraqi authorities and jailed in Iraq last year before escaping and returning here.

LIKE FATHER LIKE SON — Obama should be vetted and disclose his connection to the criminal money generating underworld. Besides, his connections to the REZCO MAFIA types, his up-coming tax fraud charges — Obama needs to disclose why he is a MUSLIM and stop suppoting our intervention in IRAQ. It’s time to introduce this fake Xerox - X box Obama and invite the thief plagiarizing pipsqueke to meet the Crooked Creek Police Department.

By Martha

February 20, 2008 5:47 PM | Link to this

Please ALL VOTERS, Go to the Google Search Engine and type in THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT. Click on that title and READ. Also, click on each of the other titles on that page and READ. AFTER READING, I AM SURE YOU WILL DEFINITELY CHANGE YOUR MINDS ABOUT VOTING FOR HILLARY. WE CANNOT AND WILL NOT ALLOW THE CLINTONS TO BE OUR LEADERS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WE CANNOT ALLOW THE CLINTONS WITH SUCH A SCANDALIST BEHAVIOR BACK IN THE WHITEHOUSE. PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING. Thank You.

By Quita

February 17, 2008 9:43 PM | Link to this

the wealthy, it couldn’t hurt to tax them when we’ve already been taxing the unwealthy, and they can’t even afford it, i understand those who support hillary, and that’s fine, she deserves mad props, however, do not discredit obama when credit is due, he has swept the last 3 primaries alone, that counts for something and i think america is ready for a change, and many could argue that hillary has had 35 years of experience, but if that is so, why hasn’t there been a change???

By Quita

February 17, 2008 9:39 PM | Link to this

both candidates have discussed health care issues…her plan is going to cost $110 Billion and his is going to cost $16 Billion. hillary wants to make it mandatory for everyone, no matter if he or she is unemployed, or working minimum wage, everyone must have it. i don’t necessarily think that is fair for everyone. obama’s plan is to make it affordible (sp) for everyone but still giving everyone a choice (as his or her right) to choose, you ask how, yes taxes of course, but he is going to tax

By Quita

February 17, 2008 9:23 PM | Link to this

I disagree that Hillary is “broke”, yes, you’re right, far from it…however it was said on more than one source that she has less support from her staff, and her staff isn’t doing as good a job as Obama’s staff…you can not be mad at that. now as far as him being cowardly, as far as i know, he hasn’t even called off the debate, in fact cnn still says the debate is on for the 27th. now let’s discuss these issues….you say that Obama hasn’t been “discussing the issues”, but has she??

By Geneva

February 16, 2008 5:58 AM | Link to this

Any one that thinks Hillary is “broke” is far from accurate. She wants to have the debate because people get a better sense of who she is. Alot of people attack her for reasons that are unfair and have nothing to do with her professionally. When she debates it isn’t about her personal life. It’s about the issues. That isn’t lost in the translation. People respond well to it. Hence, the reason Obama doesn’t want to. Do I think that’s cowardly? Yes. Smart, but cowardly.

By Geneva

February 16, 2008 5:46 AM | Link to this

I think they should debate. Quite frankly I am tired of hearing about the “Obama movement”. I’m not impressed. If I wanted to hear a powerful and moving speech then sign me up, but if I want the best for the country, then I’ll pass. He impresses upon us all the things he will do with rarely/never saying how, or why his policies are the best. Get off the soapbox and get real. I’m surprised that so many people disregard how little he has actually talked about the issues.

By Quita

February 13, 2008 9:05 PM | Link to this

You have some nerve to call an educated black man a coward when i KNOW for a fact you could never run for that office yourself due to your spelling…nor did you give any evidence as to why you would say that. we already act like you owe us everything?? YOU get over it! are you mad b/c he’s actually doing a good job in this contest?? as far as being a coward, please, he’s debated her 18 times, you might want to check your facts before you leave ignorant a*s comments sweet heart, you make yourself seem a bit SLOW. by the way, oprah doesn’t have to be ghetto because she has more money than you will see in any 3 of your lifetimes, gypsie…you do have a Blessed night and marinate on that for a little while.

By renee77

February 12, 2008 2:24 PM | Link to this

first of all i DO agree Obama is a true COWARD… he wont do another debate with Hillary because she will show him as being the inadequate one… he hides behind oprahs skirt anyone can see that… thats where he gets his majority of money thats obvious well she showed her true ghetto colors at his all for show rally … come one people wake up… they already act like we owe them everything whats next if you vote him as president…she is behind the ads.about poor blacks. get over it

By robert

February 12, 2008 4:25 AM | Link to this

Hillary is begging for a debate because she’s broke. If you notice before every debate she spend days practicing lies and falsehoods. A honest person should not have to practice for a debate unless they plan on lying. Hillary Clinton has two problems in Ohio The war in Iraq and NAFTA. I don’t need universal healthcare and I surely do not want Hillary garnishing my wages. She never explain in her healthcare program who is going to pay for the homeless and people who are not employed.

By mc

February 11, 2008 12:45 PM | Link to this

Obama doesnt need another debate. Los Angeles was to be the last debate. Now that Clinton finds herself in a bad spot, she is desparately seeks a debate. The Clinton’s are also trying to change the rules with Florida, and Michigan. She agreed like all parties involved that these states would have not delegates since they (the states) moved their primaries ahead of schedule. She is going back on her agreement with the DNC and is trying to seat Florida, and Michigan delegates. Play by the rules ok

By Kenny

February 9, 2008 9:06 AM | Link to this

Yes! It is obvious Clinton will get the best of Obama in a one on one debate. This is the reason he won’t do it. We need to see more of Obama besides his flowery speeches. We need substance. Right now I think he is a mile wide and an inch deep!

By DavidG

February 8, 2008 7:33 PM | Link to this

“We don’t have a specific date or time identified yet, but Barack Obama is committed to holding a debate in Ohio before March 4th as he travels around the state listening to Ohioans’ concerns about the economy, outsourcing, and the mortgage crisis,” Obama campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said in an e-mail.

By Mike S

February 8, 2008 1:35 PM | Link to this

As long as they discuss issues important to Ohio voters, then I’m fine with it. What’s wrong with taking a couple of hours out to reach millions of voters in and out of Ohio and express your opinions on the issues? The idea that the Obama camp wants to save his time for fundraisers and campaign rallies full of his own supporters speaks volumes of his dread for substantive debate. How many times can you say unity and hope?

By Washington30

February 8, 2008 12:17 PM | Link to this

I am sick and tired of debates. If they do end up debating, I just might skip it. It is all repitition. Maybe Obama can do a Hallmark thing like Hillary. My vote is his regardless. McCain loves war and he might try to get back at the people who tortured him. I am sure they are scared of him getting elected. I did not know he left his wife for that blond lady that tags around with him. OMG, another adultry episode. At least Obama is a family man that is able to keep his hand out of the cookie jar

By reggie98ud

February 8, 2008 8:35 AM | Link to this

Hey Patty, turn about is fair play, so why don’t you name for me one thing Hillary accomplished? NOT Bill, Hillary. Can’t come up with any can you? At least McCain can get stuff passed in Congress (even if I don’t agree with some of the stuff he has accomplished) Typical Liberal Democrats, attack a candidate for something their candidate is also guilty of. But it isn’t surprising, the Clintons have been flip flopping around that way for years!

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Remember me?




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.