FEBRUARY: Forum gives Bellbrook-Sugarcreek residents levy, tax info
Stafford also filed a complaint with the Ohio Elections Commission alleging that the political action committee supporting the district’s 2019 levy had improper involvement and funding from school district employees, including Superintendent Doug Cozad. The Elections Commission declined the schools’ request to dismiss that complaint, and it is set for a hearing April 30.
The cases are active as voters are again considering a levy request from the school district. Voting will conclude March 17.
In both cases, school officials filed for protective orders trying to limit Stafford’s public comments as well as his ability to release the content of depositions and materials obtained in the court discovery process.
In the Elections Commission complaint, the commission denied the request for the protective order, stating Stafford has constitutional rights to comment publicly. Cozad has appealed the commission’s ruling in Franklin County Common Pleas Court, and the Ohio Attorney General’s office, representing the Elections Commission, has moved to dismiss the schools’ appeal.
JANUARY: State audit suggests ways to trim schools’ budget
In the lawsuit, a Greene County magistrate ruled Thursday that depositions and court discovery materials may not be disseminated by either side, but that Stafford is not prohibited from making other public comments on the case.
Open meetings case
In the Common Pleas Court case, Stafford made two primary claims. The first was that the school board used group text messages, emails and social media communications to hold “secret meetings” to deliberate on district business, which would be in violation of Ohio open meetings law.
He cited at least a dozen instances from messages he acquired via public records law. Stafford’s attorney, Derek Clinger, said they show school board members privately discussing how to respond to criticism of the May 2019 levy.
FEBRUARY: County auditor says anti-levy mailer misquotes him
Nick Subashi, the attorney for the school board, said that the board’s messages were of a fact-finding nature, not deliberations on what action to take, and therefore not a violation of the state’s Open Record laws.
Stafford’s second claim in the Greene County lawsuit is that the board went into closed executive sessions improperly nine times in 2018 and 2019, citing a need to discuss the superintendent’s evaluation, or district property, or personnel issues, among other things.
The school board responded to the suit on Nov. 20 answer, saying it would “agree to injunctive relief” on three of the claims, tied to meetings that occurred in late 2018.
Clinger said that is an admission of guilt. Subashi said Thursday that the board does not believe the subject matter of those executive sessions was improper, but he said the board did not follow the letter of the law.
SEPTEMBER: Lawsuit alleges Bellbrook school board broke law
“The Board used the words, I move that we go into executive session for ‘the evaluation of the treasurer’ instead of saying ‘to consider the compensation or employment of a board employee,’ “ Subashi said. “Our position is that we have a couple of technical, very insignificant, tacky-tacky violations of open meetings law.”
Clinger opposed that view, saying, “Requiring the government to follow the law isn’t a ‘ticky-tack’ issue.”
Elections Commission case
Clinger said Stafford’s Elections Commission case accuses the Citizens for Bellbrook Schools political action committee of failing to disclose “in-kind contributions” from the district that promoted passage of the 2019 levy. Voters rejected that levy.
Clinger said the district used public funds to send out PAC materials, specifically one postcard mailing. He claimed the district paid multiple employees for doing PAC levy work during the work day.
Ohio law says school districts can send out basic informational material about a levy, but that anything advocating a “yes” vote can’t be paid for with public money. Subashi said Thursday the school board never spent any public funds to support the levy.
APRIL: School levy beset by errors, arguments on both sides
He said allegations that Cozad was paid for working to pass the levy were “absolute nonsense.” He said Cozad is a non-exempt employee under the Fair Labor Standards Act. He doesn’t punch a time clock and can work on the levy too as long as his superintendent duties get done, Subashi said.
Clinger did not comment on those claims from Subashi, saying the Ohio Elections Commission would decide what was required to be reported.
“These cases are about government transparency and accountability,” Clinger said. “The public is harmed when the government does not follow the law.”
Neither legal case is expected to be settled before voters cast their ballots March 17 on a 5.7-mill additional levy to raise money for Bellbrook-Sugarcreek schools.
EARLY VOTING
Voters who want to get their ballots in before primary Election Day on March 17 can vote absentee by mail or in person at their county board of elections offices.
The deadline to request absentee mail ballots is three days before the election, or March 14. Absentee ballots must be signed. Absentee ballots that are mailed must be postmarked by the day before the election to be counted, or they can be returned in-person at the county board of elections before polls close at 7:30 p.m. on Election Day. (Do not take the ballot to a polling place.)
Early voting hours are the same in all counties:
‒ 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on weekdays through March 6
‒ 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, March 7
‒ 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. from Monday, March 9, to Friday, March 13
‒ 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Saturday, March 14
‒ 1 to 5 p.m. Sunday, March 15
‒ 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday, March 16
About the Author
