Caption

Hartman: Let’s not make Jim Riggleman permanent Reds manager just yet

Apparently there is a movement afoot to make Jim Riggleman the permanent manager of the Cincinnati Reds. 

Or at least one national baseball writer who probably doesn’t watch them every day suggested interim be removed from his job title. 

Either way, doing so would be jumping the gun at this point, and Riggleman says he is going with the flow for now. 

"My understanding is there is going to be numerous interviews and a lot people you're going to want to interview are going to be playing in the postseason," Riggleman told MLB.com. "I think it's going to be a long process. I'm certainly not going to think about it, as I have no control over that.”

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

Most read

  1. 1 Dayton sells downtown building for $10 after paying $450K for it
  2. 2 Who's in Jail | Latest Montgomery County Bookings
  3. 3 Video of Xenia teacher assaulting student | Xenia teacher assaults kid

Riggleman deserves praise for the team’s turnaround to be sure. 

But as referenced yesterday in the wake of Cincinnati’s seven-game winning streak and a four-game sweep of the Cubs, there’s an overall feeling that water is finding level with this team, too. 

This was potentially a .500-ish team that is now playing about .500 ball since Riggleman replaced Bryan Price. 

That’s great. 

It’s important. 

It’s not necessarily something to build on unless finishing around .500 is the goal every year. 

>>RELATED: 10 facts to remember about the Cincinnati Reds

Why is it great? Because winning is better than losing, obviously, and you need to give fans something to feel good about before the base erodes any more. 

Why is it important? Because the team needs to have at least some success to build on — and know who to build around — moving forward. 

It does seem like Riggleman has done something to improve the esprit de corps since taking over

Moving Scott Schebler to the leadoff spot has had a positive effect. (And if memory serves, the manager said he had no reason for doing that other than something needed to be done, so it’s not exactly a sign of genius.) 

Bullpen usage has been good late, but it’s easier when you have four or five guys pitching well there. 

(I started making notes for this before he was outmaneuvered twice in crucial situations by Braves manager Brian Snitker last night. First he removed lefty Kyle Crockett only to see righty David Hernandez walk Kurt Suzuki then give up a game-tying double to lefty Danny Santana. Then he had Scooter Gennett bunt with two on and no one out in the 10th inning, allowing the Braves to walk Eugenio Suarez and pitch to Jesse Winker and Jose Peraza instead. This is problematic because they aren’t as good as Gennett or Suarez.) 

Riggleman’s quick hook for starters has had its share of detractors. I don’t know if that is his call or direction from on high to protect young arms, but regardless some of the starters are coming around now.

(Plus there doesn’t seem to be much evidence pitch counts actually prevent injury, but there is a general consensus a lot of young pitchers don’t know how to pitch through problems.) 

Most noteworthy: The Reds still make frequent mistakes on the base paths and in the field, mental errors that have to fall back on the manager. 

In short: I wouldn’t close the door on Riggleman, but I want to know who else is out there before I make a move. 

  

More from Daytondailynews