Mayor Don Patterson expressed concern with Issues 31 through 35 and is asking residents to vote in favor of the Charter Review Committee’s proposition, Issue 36.
“Council—we didn’t have any input into it. I don’t really know their (the committee’s) thought process in doing what they did,” Patterson said. “All I did was—as the Charter said—every 10 years, the mayor has to appoint a committee.”
The Charter Review Committee reviews the city’s charter and proposes changes to city council if needed. Those changes then take the form of ballot issues in an election.
“It’s an independent, impartial committee,” Patterson said.
If approved, Issue 36 would allow council members to serve for three consecutive, four-year terms before a mandatory four-year break. It also allows for the mayor to be exempt from term limits. While Patterson favors Issue 36, he said he will also support the election outcome.
“I have the utmost respect for our residents in what they want and what they would like to see,” Patterson said.
“This is something they’re going to decide. I will absolutely support whichever—both, none, or one and not the other—I will absolutely support it because I believe in our residents. Our residents are the strength of our community.”
Patterson, who has served as mayor since 2005, says his next possible election will be his last.
The term limits that were set in 2012 allow for all council members to serve two consecutive, four-year terms before taking a mandatory four-year break. Because they were not retroactive, incumbents, like the mayor, could serve on council until 2022, if re-elected in 2018.
Issue 31, proposed by Citizens, adds language to the existing charter, stating that council cannot propose any charter amendments that could alter any provision in the charter that addresses term limits, compensation or initiative, keeping the 2012 amendment intact.
Another issue raised by Alban’s group comes in the form of council vacancies. Issue 35 would require council to wait until the next general election to fill a vacancy on the council. Currently, the council appoints someone in the interim until the next election.
“A council member not elected by the people is not a bona fide representative of the people,” Alban said. “Vacancies to the U.S. House of Reps (Representatives) have been determined by the people for over 200 years. “We’re proposing the same thing be done for our Kettering council.”
One Kettering resident understands what the possible changes could mean for the city’s government.
Resident Steven Weiser said that having the same elected officials in place for 12 possible years provides continuity and that if the charter remained at two consecutive terms for council members, there’s a shorter window for goals to be accomplished.
“I can see the benefit of having them because somebody might get a substantial amount of work done in 12 years,” said Weiser, who is leaning toward voting “yes” on Issue 36.
If Issues 31 and 36 pass, both could go into effect according to the City of Kettering Law Director Ted Hamer.
“I don’t see that they would be in opposition to each other. It seems to me they could both coexist,” Hamer said.
“Assuming both would pass, they would both go into effect. The Charter would be amended as far as the term limit piece goes in (Issue) 36 and then 31 would say ‘Okay you can’t amend the Charter, City Council, any more, regarding term limits or pay’ or whatever else 31 says they can’t do,” Hamer said.
Proposed Kettering charter changes
Changes proposed by petitions
Issue No. 31 Amendment
Council may not propose any amendment that seeks to alter, abolish, or otherwise amend any provision in the charter that addresses or concerns term limitations, compensation or initiative, referendum and recall.
Any proposed amendment, whether by council or initiative, shall be submitted to the electors of the city only at a general election.
Issue No. 32 Enforcement
Any resident or taxpayer of the city will be able to seek legal action against the city. If the lawsuit is successful, the city will reimburse any cost to the resident who filed the suit.
Issue No. 33 Meetings
Prior to consideration of or vote on any proposed ordinance or resolution, Council shall provide all residents or tax payers of the city a reasonable and equal opportunity to speak on said subjects.
Issue No. 34 Transparency
The top 15 full-time highest grossing employees, the median 15 and the 15 lowest shall be included in reports mailed to registered voters, detailing the position, total wages paid by the city to the employees, and the monetary value of the city’s portion of all benefits provided to the employees. The information would also be provided on the city’s webpage. Funding for the mailing of the documentation will be provided by the city.
Issue No. 35 Vacancies
Petition deletes and then adds language to section 3-4 of the city charter regarding the process for filling the vacancies on city council. In the event of a vacancy, the successor would be elected at the next election occurring within the city, provided that council does not hold an election solely for the purpose of filling the vacancy.
Changes proposed by Charter Review Committee
Issue No. 36
Language in the charter will be changed to reflect gender neutral terms. Term limits would be increased from two to three consecutive terms of four years each. Provided the member of council served three consecutive terms, he or she would not be eligible for election for one, four-year term. The mayor has been removed from the charter language and will not be limited to term limits.
For any passage of ordinances by council, council is no longer required to publish a summary of the approval in a local newspaper. Changes to the charter to reflect State law prohibiting certain city employees being required to live in Kettering, define the term “elector” and change name of parks and reaction board to “Parks, Recreation and Cultural Arts Department” are all included in Issue 36.