Concern about possible fallout from release of the report has been particularly acute with the approach of the second anniversary Thursday of the attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. Thursday also marks 13 years since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks in the United States.
However, legislative aides said a censored version of about 500 pages of the 6,600-page review won’t be distributed this week. It could be made public later this month.
The CIA contests the report’s findings, particularly its broad conclusions that waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation techniques” failed to produce valuable information and that the intelligence agency misled the Bush administration, Congress and the public about the value of the harsh treatment. The CIA also employed unauthorized techniques on detainees and improperly held others, and never properly evaluated its own actions, according to legislative aides and report findings leaked in April.
Those findings are consistent with what senators have detailed about the investigation since its 2009 inception and what a host of news reports, human rights organizations and various governmental and non-governmental studies have suggested in the decade since the CIA’s program started coming to light. President Barack Obama has likened the harsh interrogations to torture, but the spy agency says much in the Senate committee’s report is inaccurate.
The agency insists some detainees subjected to the interrogations produced solid intelligence that helped U.S. authorities to apprehend other terror suspects and break up attacks. It is prepared to acknowledge its interrogation and detention program was badly managed in the early years, and point out that three successive CIA directors have repudiated the techniques as inconsistent with American values.