But Julio Mateo, a member of the training reform group and Dayton’s Community Police Council, said he fears the city could disregard key parts of some proposals that seek to create independent oversight.
“My primary issues are with the implementation of the oversight pieces, especially the independent auditor,” he said.
Dayton’s five police reform committees started meeting last summer to review police policies and practices and develop recommendations focused on use of force, oversight, training, engagement, and training and promotion.
The Dayton City Commission created the working groups in response to the social justice protests downtown following the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd.
More than 100 people agreed to take part in the process, including elected leaders, police officers, community activists, defense attorneys and members of the Community Police Council.
Three of the reform groups met for the last time last month, and two others expect to have their final meeting today.
As of Wednesday, the reform committees have approved 135 recommendations ― some containing many action items and requests.
About 83 recommendations have been accepted by the Dayton City Commission, and 45 are still within a 30-day window for commissioners to consider and respond to them, the mayor’s office said.
A couple of recommendations were rejected for legal reasons, and commissioners claim they needed more time to consider a few other proposals.
In response to many recommendations, commissioners directed the city manager to work with police and other departments on potential implementation.
The mayor’s office said some recommendations are in the process of being implemented, including equipping officers with body cameras, creating a new recruitment unit and putting a charter change proposal on the ballot in support of new hiring rules.
Some of the more ambitious and “bigger picture” recommendations could take years to complete.
This includes a recommendation for an alternative response model that sends nonpolice specialists to certain types of calls involving people struggling with mental illness or other crises.
Torey Hollingsworth, senior policy aide to Mayor Nan Whaley, has met with the five reform groups to outline proposed next steps. A short-term implementation committee will be created that consists of three representatives from each of the police reform working groups, she said.
The new committee, she said, will receive progress updates from city staff about implementation efforts to ensure they align with the reform working groups’ intentions.
“If something isn’t being interpreted in the way the group intended, this committee is going to give feedback to staff to make sure there is an opportunity to course-correct,” she said.
The group also will provide input to help develop a “long-term accountability structure” to keep the community engaged and involved in reviewing and deciding police policies and building relationships, Hollingsworth said. A finalized proposal for a long-term accountability plan likely will be unveiled at a city commission work session this spring.
The proposed long-term plan includes new committees focused on use of force, recruitment, community engagement, training, policy and a new community appeals board.
Other recommendations from the reform committees include a new independent accountability auditor, a police complaint intake position and a low-level discipline program where officers can self-report minor violations.
The proposed next steps should ensure the police reform groups’ recommendations are prioritized, said McClain, with the oversight committee.
The implementation plan will promote transparency and accountability while also strengthening the relationship between police and the community, he said.
But Mateo said he believes the city has ignored crucial parts of the oversight committee’s recommendations to create an independent accountability auditor and complaint intake position.
Mateo said the city proposes to make these new positions answer to the city manager, which he says is problematic and means they are not independent. The city should follow the recommendations as proposed, he said, and the complaint intake position and auditor should be under the Human Relations Council to be separate from city administration.
Dayton City Commissioner Matt Joseph, co-lead of the oversight committee, said his committee had “zero” concerns about the complaint intake position’s proposed place in the organization ― possibly under the mediation center, which answers to the city manager.
Joseph said the position is not at real risk of corruption or undue influence, because the job primarily will involve accepting complaints, helping people go through the process and providing them with updates.
Joseph said the independent auditor might be under both the city commission and the city manager to ensure he or she has access to all the necessary information.
“If it was city commission-side employee solely, structurally the city commission cannot tell a city manager-side employee what to do,” he said. “It’s not the way they’re built.”
He said his group wants the new auditor to be independent and effective, and they are confident that will happen.
Will Smith, who served as a consultant or “bridge” between the reform groups, said the process was not easy and it took a great deal of time, but it brought together people who traditionally haven’t been at the table.
He said there were disagreements and “heavy” conversations, but participants spoke freely and shared different perspectives. Smith believes more community voices can join in this work moving forward and he’s eager to see the implementation and impact of the reform groups’ work.