“As a treasurer, I have to see the long term, not just the bottom line for this year,” she said. “I don’t know what is coming. So I have to put it in my five-year forecast and see which items can be done and which cannot.”
RELATED: Dayton schools, Five Rivers to open school health center
Abraha and Lolli both said it will be a matter of prioritizing which efforts will have the most impact.
“We’ll send out options and costs before the 28th, so (the board) will have, like a menu — we’re going to choose this, this and this, to equal a certain dollar amount,” Lolli said. “I will not break the bank. I don’t believe in that. I’m someone who cuts positions that are extra or not needed in the school buildings to make sure we’re spending appropriately.”
Argument over legality
The school board was originally scheduled to vote on a formal resolution regarding the plan, but in an hourlong debate, board member John McManus vehemently argued that the specific wording of the resolution violated Ohio law, in part by improperly delegating board authority to the superintendent.
RELATED: DPS to close one school, shake up teaching staff at others
School board vice president Jocelyn Rhynard said an attorney who represents the district had read and signed off on the resolution, which was created by board members William Harris, Mohamed Al-Hamdani and Robert Walker.
But after McManus brought up specific passages of Ohio law, existing court precedents and a previous state auditor’s ruling, the board unanimously supported his motion to table the formal resolution. Board member Sheila Taylor repeatedly said they should simply have the superintendent present a plan, without acting on the resolution.
The resolution in question said the board would “authorize the superintendent to identify and execute investments” for student success, “and instruct the treasurer” to provide necessary funding.
DPS superintendent scammed out of paycheck
McManus said that wording would “put the treasurer in a box” that eliminated checks and balances. If any superintendent proposed a costly, unwise initiative, the treasurer would have to either go along and hurt the district, or be in violation of the board’s resolution.
Board members also publicly discussed division and factions on the board more than in the past. Taylor said she was frustrated with others adding late items to the agenda with little time for review. McManus said he was upset that the four newer board members exclude he and Taylor, and sometimes Walker, from discussions.
“You’ve got four votes, we can’t stop you, but what you’re doing here (on the resolution) is so incredibly dangerous and unlawful,” McManus said. “And I ask you, if you never listen to a word Sheila or I have to say, I ask you this one time to reconsider what you’re doing.”
RELATED: Dayton schools to launch fire/EMS career program
Board member Karen Wick-Gagnet said she thought the argument over the resolution was just a matter of semantics. But she thanked McManus and Taylor for their input.
“It saddens me a bit to hear of the feelings of division amongst the team, because I think that a team is only as strong as its weakest links, and if our communication has been weak, I apologize,” she said. “As a board, we need to work collaboratively together on these issues to move the district forward.”
Walker said the trio that wrote the resolution “had a level of excitement” about the ability to accelerate student progress, given a financial surplus, adding that they never meant to exclude others. He urged the board to see the consensus they had about the key priorities, and to come together around those.