Miami County Board of Elections officials cannot agree on new voting machines. The county has used touch screen devices for years, but one option under consideration now is a paper system, like the one shown here in Clark County, in which voters fill in ovals and put their ballot into a scanner to be counted. BILL LACKEY/STAFF

Miami County deadlocked on new voting machines

“I really don’t give a damn what they want,” Chairman David Fisher, a Democrat, said this week during another board discussion on options to replace the county’s touch-screen voting system purchased in 2005.

Elections board members agreed after around 75 minutes of debate – but no formal vote — that it is deadlocked 2 to 2 on a Clear Ballot paper voting system and a hybrid system offered by ES&S. The paper system has the voter fill out by hand a paper ballot that is scanned, while the hybrid system uses a touch screen to mark the ballot that is printed onto paper and scanned.

TRENDING: A new $13M project will boost this Dayton area still stinging from Good Samaritan closure

The board has looked at options ranging from around $500,000 to more than $1.8 million.

The commissioners last week told election board member Ryan King, a Republican, and director Bev Kendall they would be willing to subsidize the $1,096,490 the state has allocated for a new system.

In the followup letter the board received Tuesday, the commissioners said they “are adamant that our voting process does not go backwards to a paper ballot system.” The board further said it strongly recommended the purchase of a hybrid system that has a cost estimate of nearly $1.9 million.

TRENDING: Local sci-fi author gets coffee with ‘Harry Potter’ author J.K. Rowling in New York

Fisher and fellow Democrat Audrey Gillespie indicated support for the paper system, while King and fellow Republican Rob Long said a hybrid system was the best choice.

Gillespie said she personally liked a hybrid system but added she believed it would be “fiscally irresponsible” to spend another $750,000 for a hybrid system when a paper system would meet needs. The $750,000 would be better spent elsewhere, she said.

Fisher called the hybrid system set up “no more than an electronic three quarter of a million dollar marking device.”

King said a return to a paper voting system after county voters have used the touch screen system for more than a dozen years makes no sense.

“Nothing in this world went back to paper,” he said.

King said a county information technology staff member who saw vendor presentations during the past year favored a hybrid system.

TRENDING: Local brewery owner lashes out against ‘naysayers’

King also pointed out a secretary of state’s representative Tuesday encouraged the board to “put the brakes” on a decision until state purchasing prices on equipment options are available to all counties.

Fisher, who has said elections boards have kicked a decision on equipment down the road too long, said he hopes the board can make a decision soon.

Thank you for reading the Dayton Daily News and for supporting local journalism. Subscribers: log in for access to your daily ePaper and premium newsletters.

Thank you for supporting in-depth local journalism with your subscription to the Dayton Daily News. Get more news when you want it with email newsletters just for subscribers. Sign up here.