“Nearly a third of the states offer no early voting,” the appeals court said. “Adopting plaintiffs’ theory of disenfranchisement would create a ‘one-way ratchet’ that would discourage states from ever increasing early voting opportunities, lest they be prohibited by federal courts from later modifying their election procedures in response to changing circumstances.”
The ruling comes after the state appealed a decision by U.S. District Judge Michael Watson in May. He sided with Democrats on their golden-week claim, finding that the cut violates the Voting Rights Act and voters’ equal protection rights.
Watson had said evidence presented in the case reflected that black voters use same-day voter registration and early voting options at higher rates than whites. While the court can’t predict how African-Americans will turn out in future elections, he said, “It is reasonable to conclude from this evidence that their right to vote will be modestly burdened” by the law.
More than 60,000 people voted during golden week in 2008, while over 80,000 cast ballots during the period in 2012, Watson had noted.
The appeals court reversed Watson’s decision.
The 6th Circuit said that in evaluating the law’s burden, “We find that elimination of Golden Week is a small part of what remains, objectively viewed, a generous early voting schedule.”
Judge David McKeague wrote the opinion, joined by Judge Richard Allen Griffin. Both were appointed by Republican President George W. Bush.
Judge Jane Branstetter Stranch disagreed. She was appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama.
“The charge that this appeal_and apparently many others_intrude upon the right of the states to run their own election process is both unfounded and antiquated,” Stranch wrote in her dissent.
In a statement, Republican Secretary of State Jon Husted welcomed the decision and called on Democrats to “end their wasteful lawsuits so we can all move forward with this election.”
The Democrats didn’t have an immediate comment. Their options include asking the appeals court to reconsider or appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court