Related: Vicki West, HIV-positive prostitute, arrested again
Batista argues that while the government has an legitimate public health interest in preventing the spread of infectious diseases, the law lacks a rational basis. Why is the transmission of HIV criminalized but not other infectious diseases such as Hepatitis C and HPV? Batista argues that Ohio’s law, passed in 2000, speaks to a prejudice against those with HIV, even as treatment methods have advanced to make the diseases manageable.
In 2015, 22,355 Ohioans were living with HIV, according to state health records. Prosecutors argue that the law is narrowly tailored to stop one method of virus transmission and once informed, consenting adults may make their own decisions about sexual conduct.
Batista also argues that First Amendment court cases articulate the right to speak as well as not to speak.
The Ohio Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday, May 17.
Related: Police: HIV+ woman arrested again on prostitution-related charges
Several groups filed amicus briefs to support Batista’s arguments: the American Academy of HIV Medicine, Center for HIV Law and Policy, Human Rights Commission, Ohio Public Defender, Center for Constitutional Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union.
States began criminalizing HIV non-disclosure, starting with Louisiana in 1987, according to the University of Cincinnati Law Review. Between 2003 and 2013, Ohio had 356 HIV-related prosecutions and 59 convictions, making it the state with the fourth highest record of HIV criminalizations, the UC Law Review reported in 2015.
Violating the Ohio law is a second degree felony that can carry a two to eight year prison sentence.