Officers were originally asking for a $2,500 lump sum “equity adjustment” and a five percent increase the first year and four percent pay raises the next two years accepted the fact finders’ recommendation.
Because police cannot strike, when contract talks reach an impasse and a fact-finder’s recommendations aren’t agreed upon, the contract goes to a conciliator for the final decision. The conciliator decided the township police are underpaid compared to some of their peers in other communities and said the township was too conservative in its revenue projections for the police levy fund.
MORE: West Chester Twp. administrator resigns
“The conciliator agrees the township should be congratulated for its management of the fund,” conciliator Steven Ball wrote. “Clearly, however, the $11.3 million carryover reflects recovery from the recession and exceeds the township’s goal of a 25 percent carryover by at least an additional 50 percent. The employees obtained only a 1.5 percent increase in wages for the three years of the last contract, largely because of the conservative predictions of income and expenses.”
Trustee Board President Mark Welch was not happy with the new deal or the conciliator’s comment. He said the township can afford to pay the raises but it should not be penalized for good fiscal management.
FOLLOW Denise Callahan on Facebook
“We feel it’s one of those things where we were sort of penalized for our success,” Welch said. “We’ve been really watching our money in West Chester and we’re really doing well. This conciliator thought ‘hey, you’re doing well the cops should do well too.’ ”
Police union leaders and their attorney did not return calls for comment.