But we were talking about the House Appropriations Committee trying to get all of its spending bills passed so the government wouldn’t run out of money. “There’s broad bipartisan support,” said Rep. Nita Lowey of New York, the top-ranking Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. “Unless they want to stick some junk in there.”
“Sticking some junk in there” is, in this case, probably synonymous with The Wall. “Shall we say we’re negotiating?” said Lowey in a phone interview.
Negotiations would presumably involve putting up some more money for other security along the border that doesn’t involve a 30-foot concrete wall. Maybe not your top priority, but if you want to make the system keep staggering along, you’ve got to have a little bit of give.
Hey, did you know that next year the House Appropriations Committee will have its first female chairman in history? I know we have a lot of first women things going on these days, but this is one to be noted.
“Not yet!” cried Lowey. “I have to be elected first.” Lowey has been the ranking Democrat on the committee for ages, and truly the chances that she won’t naturally succeed to the top job when the Democrats take control are … well, I think you really can count on it.
Meanwhile, best bet for keeping everything running is a supercompromise in which Congress tosses in a little more money for … something along the border. Repairing the existing fences, or flying a few more drones, or just broadcasting football games to the bored border guards.
Then the president could pretend it was for The Wall. He’s been doing that for ages, actually. “We started building our Wall. I’m so proud of it. We started. We started. We have $1.6 billion and we’ve already started,” he tells the folks at his rallies.
Actually, the $1.6 billion was explicitly not for a Wall. Nothing’s started. But what the hey. Maybe Mexico will pay for it.
Writes for The New York Times.