Reader asks about continuously variable transmissions

Wheels: An e-mail from Romey asks:

“What are your thoughts on continuously variable transmissions (CVT)? I saw an article that had a listing of the ‘Eight Low-Cost Vehicles for 2015.’ Some of them listed were equipped with a CVT transmission. What are your thoughts on CVT transmissions relative to initial cost, fuel economy, durability (will they last 200,000 miles) and distinct advantages? Are there different types? Do you think this is the wave of the future?”

Halderman: Thanks for writing with a good question. Without a doubt, a CVT transmission offers better fuel economy than a conventional automatic transmission. This is one of the reasons it is being used by more vehicle manufacturers. It has some advantages and disadvantages just as any transmission design.

Advantages:

  1. Very smooth without any jerking because it doesn't actually shift gears like a conventional automatic transmission.
  2. Allows the vehicle to achieve fuel economy close to that of a manual transmission.

Disadvantages:

  1. Unknown long-term durability. The Ford 500 did offer a CVT, but it was dropped and replaced with a six-speed automatic. I read that the warranty cost was about double that of the six-speed.
  2. Cannot be repaired and instead is now a replacement-only assembly, which could be costly.

What do I think about a CVT? I do like the smoothness. I do not like the high engine speed when climbing hills. I prefer a conventional automatic transmission, especially if it is a six- or more speed automatic.

Have an automotive question? Write to Jim at jim@jameshalderman.com.

About the Author