Air Force has not yet responded to congressional concerns about AFMC leadership

Dayton’s congressman quietly expressed concern about AFMC’s command status last month
Gen. Duke Z. Richardson, Air Force Materiel Command commander, speaks to AFMC Civic Leader Program members and others during a company pitch event at the MassChallenge offices in Boston, Sept. 22. (U.S. Air Force photo by Todd Maki)

Gen. Duke Z. Richardson, Air Force Materiel Command commander, speaks to AFMC Civic Leader Program members and others during a company pitch event at the MassChallenge offices in Boston, Sept. 22. (U.S. Air Force photo by Todd Maki)

As of Monday, the Air Force had not yet responded to public questions about the four-star command status of Air Force Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, expressed in a letter sent earlier this month by Ohio’s senators and U.S. Rep. Mike Turner, and in an earlier letter Turner quietly sent last month.

Turner sent a letter to Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink on June 20 stating his conviction that the command needs and deserves the leadership of a four-star general, the highest rank an officer can attain in the Air Force.

That letter, shared recently with the Dayton Daily News by Turner’s office, was not initially publicized.

A later letter from Turner and Ohio’s two senators restates those concerns.

The Air Force has not yet responded to either letter, a representative of Turner’s office told the Dayton Daily News Monday.

The more recent letter, released last week, urges Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth not to strip Wright-Patterson Air Force Base of its four-star command status, as Hegseth and the Trump administration move to reduce the numbers of the military’s top officers.

Senators Jon Husted and Bernie Moreno, with Turner, sought to make the case to Hegseth that a four-star general should lead AFMC, the command responsible for researching, acquiring and maintaining Air Force planes and armaments.

The east entrance of the Air Force Materiel Command headquarters building will receive a modern upgrade, featuring an accessible entryway, as part of the ongoing building renovation process. (Air Force Materiel Command image.)

icon to expand image

All three politicians are Republicans. Wright-Patterson, with some 35,000 military and civilian employees, has long been Ohio’s largest concentration of employment in a single location. Protecting the base has been a principal concern for Ohio elected officials.

“While I applaud Secretary Hegseth’s steps to streamline leadership, the loss of a four-star position at AFMC would significantly impact U.S. national security,” Turner wrote in his June 20 letter to Meink.

Turner penned that letter before the official retirement of Gen. Duke Z. Richardson earlier in July. Richardson’s deputy, Lt. Gen. Linda Hurry, a three-star general, assumed the duties of commander.

“AFMC touches nearly every aspect of the service, providing airmen with everything they need from uniforms to spare parts to nuclear-capable B-2 bombers. Its scope and responsibilities are vast, complex, and critical to supporting our warfighters and maintaining lethality throughout the Air Force,” the senators wrote with Turner in their more recent letter, echoing themes Turner struck earlier.

Headquartered at Wright-Patterson, AFMC manages an $81 billion annual budget and a global workforce of 89,000 people who research, equip and sustain Air Force planes, weapons and equipment. That figure represents more than a third of the Air Force budget, dispersed across multiple installations.

The historic headquarters of Air Force Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base is undergoing its first comprehensive renovation since the 1940s. This photo was taken in August 2024. MARSHALL GORBY\STAFF

icon to expand image

As Turner noted in his earlier letter, AFMC is the Air Force’s largest command by budget and its second largest by number of Air Force personnel.

A spokeswoman for the Department of the Air Force said senior leaders will respond directly to members of Congress. “I don’t have any information to share at this time,” spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said.

The Air Force does not make public its congressional correspondence, she added.

About the Author