Centerville appeals Sheetz ruling to Ohio Supreme Court

Centerville is appealing to the Ohio Supreme Court a November ruling by the Second District Court of Appeals that said the city must accept the recommendations of its planning commission approving the plan for a new Sheetz gas station at at 6318 Far Hills Ave. The site is the home of Elsa's Mexican Restaurant. STAFF FILE PHOTO

Centerville is appealing to the Ohio Supreme Court a November ruling by the Second District Court of Appeals that said the city must accept the recommendations of its planning commission approving the plan for a new Sheetz gas station at at 6318 Far Hills Ave. The site is the home of Elsa's Mexican Restaurant. STAFF FILE PHOTO

Centerville is asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the Sheetz development case, seeking to overturn a recent Second District Court of Appeals ruling allowing the gas station and convenience store.

Last month, the Second District Court of Appeals ruled that Centerville must accept the recommendations of Centerville Planning Commission, which in 2023 approved the plan for the site at 6318 Far Hills Ave.

That ruling upheld a Montgomery County Common Pleas Court decision in January that overturned City Council’s 2023 rejection of the site-plan application. The proposal, from Sheetz, Hemmert Far Hills, and developer Skilken Gold’s Morse Road Development, would redevelop the Elsa’s Mexican Restaurant property on Far Hills Avenue.

Centerville appealed the lower court’s ruling in January.

This news outlet reached out to a city spokeswoman about the appeal and received a comment that said the city “has filed an appeal asking the Ohio Supreme Court to review the decision of the Court of Appeals that upheld the trial court’s decision allowing the Sheetz development.”

“Centerville strongly believes this case raises important questions about local land-use authority and our elected officials’ ability to make responsible planning decisions that reflect community values,” the city said in the comment. “City Council unanimously determined the character of the Sheetz proposal was not consistent with the surrounding properties as required by Centerville unified development ordinance. We continue to believe that those closest to our residents’ needs should retain the authority to make these critical decisions.”

The Dayton Daily News reached out to attorneys for Sheetz, Elsa’s and Skilken Gold for comment.

About the Author