“I made an assumption,” Weber said, then adding, “Mr. Ritchie advised that he was loading — he believed he was loading the weapon. … And I put that out there the first time. When I was questioned by the officer, I said, he believes he’s load — he’s loading it with bullets. I said bullets.”
RELATED: Deposition: Williams shot Crawford because he ‘was about to’ point a weapon
“When did you discover that error?” Starks asked.
“I — I knew that I had said bullets and Mr. Ritchie had said — had said loading the weapon. I knew that from the moment I said it,” Weber answered.
“Why didn’t you correct it right after you said it?” Starks asked.
“Because loading a weapon — I made the assumption bullets, but he felt he was loading the weapon, and that’s — you put ammunition or bullets inside of a weapon,” Weber answered.
RELATED: Beavercreek officer who shot John Crawford III back on ‘full duty’
A message seeking comment about Weber or her deposition was not immediately returned by Beavercreek city law director Stephen McHugh.
In the deposition that took an hour and seven minutes, Weber also said the only questions Williams asked were if someone on the phone had eyes on Crawford and if the dispatcher could confirm someone thought he was loading the weapon.
“He’s like loading it right now,” Ritchie told a Fairborn dispatcher early in the 911 call — the first of a few times he talked about if Crawford was loading the item.
After telling a dispatcher he didn’t have any idea what Crawford was loading it with because he wasn’t going to get that close, Ritchie said he thought Crawford was holding a black rifle.
RELATED: Feds won’t charge Beavercreek officer in Walmart shooting
“You said you saw him put — load it?” Weber asked during the 911 call of which a transcript was filed in court documents.
“He looked like he was trying to load it. I don’t know,” Ritchie answered.
Immediately after that, an officer asked Weber if the caller had an eye on the man and she said, “Affirmative,” later adding, “Believes it’s a rifle, believes he just put some bullets inside.”
The officer answered, “Clear.”
RELATED: Beavercreek’s legal bill in Crawford case: $430,000 and rising
Nearly a minute later, Ritchie told dispatchers the man pointed the weapon at two children.
Thirty seconds later, Ritchie twice said Crawford was on the phone, something officers said they didn’t know in their depositions and Weber never relayed, according to the transcript.
About 40 seconds after that, Williams fired and hit Crawford twice.
Police said Crawford didn’t respond to requests by Williams and Sgt. David Darkow to drop the item. Crawford family attorneys said Crawford had less than a second to hear and respond to anything officers said.
RELATED: Where’s Daddy? — a look back one year after the shooting
Williams was cleared by a Greene County special grand jury in September 2014, and a federal investigation ended in 2017 without criminal charges.
Weber, who started with the department in late 2011, said in the deposition that she was neither disciplined nor commended for her actions related to Crawford.
Weber also said there was no specific active shooter instruction in her training outline but that after the Crawford case, Beavercreek dispatchers have had active shooter education.
The other mistake Weber said she made was not telling Ritchie to hide or evacuate the store: “I should have asked him if he was in a safe position, and I did not,” she said.
RELATED: Shooting a ‘perfect storm of circumstances’
Asked if, besides that, everything else she did in the call was appropriate, Weber said, “Yes.”
Over an objection from Freund, Starks asked Weber what her reaction was when she found what Crawford was holding.
“I just thought it was sad. It’s — it’s sad that he was carrying a — a pellet gun, and that’s what it was, you know. It wasn’t a — a rifle,” Weber said. “It was sad.”
MORE: Read other stories from Mark Gokavi
SOCIAL MEDIA: Follow Mark Gokavi on Twitter or Facebook
DOWNLOAD OUR FREE MOBILE APPS FOR LATEST BREAKING NEWS