Such incidents, she said, should be “left up to local authorities to make that determination and not something for the federal government to weigh in to.”
This is where the Donald Trump presidency appears to be most comfortable. Asked to weigh in on behalf of non-whites? Nope.
Sanders’ statements sidestepped the reason why the federal government must always be ready to play a role. Maybe she is unaware?
There was a time when it was the local law, often a Southern sheriff, who unleashed the dogs on civil rights protesters, who turned a blind eye as racists did their mischief, dissuading a black vote or desegregated schools. And it was the federal government that had to step in.
That need for federal oversight still exists, but don’t expect to get the sort of work the U.S. Justice Department’s civil rights arm did for the city of Ferguson, Missouri, after the 2014 shooting death of Michael Brown.
Following Brown’s death, the DOJ produced a 100-page report examining not what happened to him, but why people were so angry about it. And while nothing excuses violent protests the report certainly explained why people were fed up with police gunning down African Americans in alarming numbers.
The DOJ report detailed how through the years court systems and policing policies began to drive revenue for city coffers, unencumbered by the effect it had on community relations and who was targeted.
This type of deep-dive is the role of the federal government, especially when local authorities either won’t or can’t sufficiently act.
Yet Attorney General Jeff Sessions signaled long ago that his Justice Department has no interest in producing these types of reports, or aiding troubled police departments through consent decrees, as happened in Ferguson, whereby the federal government monitors municipalities to ensure they meet set benchmarks intended to “improve community policing, ensure bias-free practices, protect First Amendment rights, prevent excessive force, recruit a diverse workforce and increase officer accountability and transparency.”
President Trump’s legacy might well be a harsh lesson in how quickly race relations can tumble and splinter. Without the monitors of the federal government, without DOJ guidance, backed by a president comfortable with and engaged in issues relating to race, we see the vacuum left behind.
Sanders’ declarative statements were a stellar performance reiterating how aloof, obtuse and ultimately obstructive this administration is to the racial soul of America.
Writes for Tribune Content Agency.