However, on the other side of town, residents who were asked Monday had little to say against it — if they even knew what the plant was — and felt there were better ways Monroe could be spending its tax dollars.
Many residents still associate Monroe as an Armco/AK town, and generally agree on the importance of the SunCoke project for the local steelmaker’s viability since it will sell AK coke and energy for the next 20 years. Equally as many are aware of the new air permit SunCoke is seeking and plan to attend the Ohio Environmental Protection agency hearing Wednesday, Sept. 2, on it.
However, most are not fans of the AK pollution they already deal with or the potential emissions from another nearby plant.
“I’m not against the project, I just don’t like where it is going to be,” said Gene Wagers as he walked his dog on Niederlander Lane. “I’m not against the jobs or AK, I just don’t want it next to a neighborhood.”
Wagers used to live in Oneida near the AK Steel property line, He said he remembers as a kid taking a magnet into the backyard to catch the particles emitted from the facility and play with them on a piece of paper. The 60-year-old said he thought he was safe about four miles away, but finds himself at the mercy of another manufacturer: SunCoke.
“You’re talking quality of life as far as I am concerned,” Wagers said. “This is a quiet neighborhood and no matter what they say, that plant is going to bring so much pollution and so much noise.”
But Danielle Short, who lives on the other side of town in Easton Manor, said she knows about AK Steel, but didn’t know what SunCoke was and therefore was not worried about it, especially since it was being built in Middletown. She felt there were better causes the city could spend its money on.
“I think that is a lot of money for (Monroe) to spend if they are not going to stop the plant from being built anyway,” said the 29-year-old mother of three. “It’s not even in our area.”
Tax money used for legal dispute
Residents have a lot of opinions on how Monroe should spend its tax dollars in regards to its legal actions against the SunCoke Energy plant — they just don’t agree on how much.
Monroe City Manager William Brock said the city has spent $358,245.96 for legal counsel and expert opinions in its fight against SunCoke for its plant set to be built near its border in Middletown.
Actions have focused on the air permit issued by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency in November — including an appeal of the permit — a federal Clean Air Act lawsuit and an appeal of the decision of the Ohio Power Siting Board concerning the coke plant. The federal suit has since been dismissed and the air permit appeal has been temporarily canceled.
While in a statement Monroe officials said the actions have been expensive, “there have been positive results since Monroe took legal action,” including the voluntary halt of construction by SunCoke, further review of the air permit by the U.S. EPA and an application for a New Source Review permit by SunCoke, which includes a reduction 400 tons/year reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions.
But whether residents think those tax dollars spent and legal actions filed were warranted depends on which side of the city they live.
Near the plant border
Rachel Watkins, 36, a resident on Carol Ann Lane near the plant site, admitted she is not entirely sure what SunCoke is, but said she is confident it will bring more pollution and noise to her quiet neighborhood where she has lived for 11 years raising three children.
“Sure, the plant is bringing the type of jobs (Middletown) wants, but they could move into a less residential area,” she said.
While she is not thrilled about the plant, she isn’t quite satisfied with the money Monroe has been spending fighting it. Watkins said she appreciates that city leaders “care about the community,” but her kids are having classes in trailers because there isn’t enough room in the schools.
“If (Monroe) has got that much money, maybe they should improve the schools a bit with it,” she said.
Donna Doyle, 36, who lives on Niederlander, said she thinks Monroe’s fight “is a good use of our tax money and is hardly anything compared to what SunCoke and AK have put into it.”
She moved to the neighborhood two and a half years ago and was disappointed to find that also meant moving next to a future coke plant site. With four children and another one on the way, she’s concerned about the potential health effects from SunCoke emissions.
“It doesn’t seem the EPA is protecting the people and their health at all,” she said. “I know this is supposed to be a ‘green’ plant, but it’s still going to create more pollution than is already here.”
Virginia Hall on nearby Todhunter Road said she’s “torn” on wanting to see people working in the 500 temporary and 75 permanent jobs SunCoke intends to bring, and not wanting the plant built.
She already has a lung condition and has seen her property value drop because of the economy. As far as she is concerned, “I will give (Monroe) more tax money to fight it. I don’t get why (SunCoke) wants to build here.”
Neighbor Edna Wirtley, 73, said her husband and son worked for Armco and she has a son-in-law at AK Steel’s Rockport plant. But that doesn’t mean she wants a new coke plant near her home.
“We worked hard for what we have and it’s not going to go for what it is worth. We are going to love it forever,” she said. “I feel like we’ve been betrayed (by Middletown).”
Neighbors across town
Across Ohio 63 on the other side of Monroe, Patty Dalrymple, 52, said in terms of SunCoke building a plant it would be “fine if they did, fine if they don’t.”
She and her husband have lived all over the Butler County fixing up homes, so if the coke plant is built and she didn’t like it, they could easily move.
In terms of the money Monroe has spent, she said “I think they could spend it better than on SunCoke in the community.”
Rebecca Midkiff, 23, a resident of the Easton Manor neighborhood, said she felt Monroe’s tax dollars would be better spent fixing the schools or the intersection at Ohio 63 and Interstate 75, where she said more work should have been done before the outlet mall opened because the construction “stops traffic and the area is just horrible.”
Chad Becknell, 39, who works as a train operator at AK Steel, said he hates that his tax dollars are going toward a fight against SunCoke, which if built would secure his job and the jobs of others at Middletown Works.
“Just let it go and do what (Monroe) is supposed to be doing,” he said. “The steel mill has been there long before this place was even a city.”
Dan Hamil, 59, a retiree of AK Steel, said he’d much rather Monroe fix the Ohio 63/I-75 interchange or the schools.
“Simply, I think the SunCoke plant is fine and the city of Monroe is wasting our tax dollars,” he said.
Sandra Scott, 47, who lives on the Lakota Local School District side of Monroe, said she is not sure what the SunCoke plant is, but is concerned about more pollution.
“I think (Monroe) should do as much as they can to fight more pollution,” she said. “It has always been a concern with AK being there.”
However, Dan Jordan, 56, said he can’t believe he’s paying the city to keep him out of a potential job. As a carpenter who has been laid off on and off for about a year, he said he would love to get a job at the plant if he could.
“They could be spending that money better on other things,” he said.
Jordan said he has spoken for the plant at Monroe City Council meetings and thinks the city could find a way to prosper from the plant rather than spending money fighting it.
While he’s not happy about potentially more pollution in the area, “the coke plant that is there right now creates more pollution.
“Anything that creates more jobs can’t be that bad,” he said. “I think SunCoke is good for the community.”
About the Author